Compare StocksNOW vs NRG

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, NOW is overvalued at $140, with a DCF intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of -66%. NRG is undervalued at $107, with an intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of 29%. Of the two, NRG has the wider margin of safety.

NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$139.69
VS
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$107.11

Rewards

NOW
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
NRG
  • Share count has been reduced by 17% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.42 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

NOW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
NRG
  • ROIC has declined by 5.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 27.9x is 34% above the historical average of 20.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NOW
NRG
Valuation
$5.15B
Free Cash Flow
$772.37M
3.57%
FCF Yield
3.43%
87.86
Trailing P/E
27.89
27.91
Forward P/E
9.57
Quality & Moat
2.26%
ROIC
11.80%
14.24%
ROE
23.77%
74.77%
Gross Margin
18.80%
1.03
PEG Ratio
0.42
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Net Debt / Equity
4.80
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.31
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.16
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.77%
NOW: 4Ties: 2NRG: 6
NOWNRG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NRG
$39.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$590.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$23.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NOW
66.4% Overvalued
Price is 66.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $139.69
Fair Value: $83.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NRG
29.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 29.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $107.11
Fair Value: $150.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $140?

+27.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.7%

The market implies +27.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NRG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

+21.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.6%

The market implies +21.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
NRG
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NRG
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,128
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NRG
Insiders 4.5%Institutions 95.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,416
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NRG
2
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.77M
SPENCER GERALD ALFRED
Officer
$191,069
@ $120.93 · 2026-09-08
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$1.57M
@ $140.64 · 2026-07-15
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$2.55M
@ $127.52 · 2026-06-15
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$783,250
@ $156.65 · 2026-03-16
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $156.56 · 2026-01-07
CURCI BRIAN
General Counsel
$17.26M
@ $160.46 · 2026-01-06
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.21M
@ $158.79 · 2026-01-06
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $163.82 · 2025-11-14
LIYANEARACHCHI DAK
Chief Technology Officer
$1.65M
@ $155.00 · 2025-09-10
HOWELL KEVIN T
Director
$7.72M
@ $154.50 · 2025-05-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NOW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NRG
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NOW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
NRG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View NOW Full AnalysisView NRG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NOW vs NRG

Is ServiceNow, Inc. or NRG Energy, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NRG trades at a 29.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $151 vs. price $107), compared to NOW's -66.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $140).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ServiceNow, Inc. or NRG Energy, Inc.?

NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while NRG scores 42/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is NRG Energy, Inc. in financial distress?

NRG's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NOW scores 8.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, ServiceNow, Inc. or NRG Energy, Inc.?

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) generates a 3.6% free cash flow yield, compared to NRG Energy, Inc.'s 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ServiceNow, Inc. or NRG Energy, Inc.?

NRG earns 11.8% ROIC versus NOW's 2.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.