Compare StocksNKE vs VZ

NIKE, Inc. (NKE) vs Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, NKE is undervalued at $42, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of 74%. VZ is overvalued at $47, with an intrinsic value of $33 and a margin of safety of -43%. Of the two, NKE has the wider margin of safety.

NKE
NIKE, Inc.
$41.71
VS
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
$46.81

Rewards

NKE
  • NIKE, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • NIKE, Inc. scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
VZ
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • FCF yield of 8.9% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.89 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

NKE
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
VZ
  • High leverage (1.82x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.24 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NKE
VZ
Valuation
$1.89B
Free Cash Flow
$17.47B
3.05%
FCF Yield
8.94%
19.86
Trailing P/E
12.19
18.16
Forward P/E
8.88
Quality & Moat
17.95%
ROIC
8.44%
22.14%
ROE
15.84%
43.24%
Gross Margin
59.45%
1.60
PEG Ratio
0.89
Balance Sheet Safety
0.14
Net Debt / Equity
1.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.76
3.93%
Dividend Yield
6.05%
NKE: 4Ties: 1VZ: 7
NKEVZ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NKE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NKE
$-20.28
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$5.15B
Δ Market Cap
$-104.45B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VZ
$0.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$12.54B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.29B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NKE
74.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 74.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $41.71
Fair Value: $163.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VZ
42.9% Overvalued
Price is 42.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $46.81
Fair Value: $32.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NKE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $42?

+7.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.8%

The market implies +7.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

VZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $47?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.1%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NKE
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VZ
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NKE
-2.18
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VZ
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NKE
Insiders 1.7%Institutions 81.7%Retail & Other 16.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VZ
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 70.7%Retail & Other 29.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,969
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NKE
0
Buys (3M)
9
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.19M
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $42.27 · 2026-04-13
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $42.27 · 2026-04-13
COOK TIMOTHY D
Director
$1.06M
@ $42.43 · 2026-04-10
ROGERS JOHN W JR
Director
$173,360
@ $43.34 · 2026-04-09
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$500,002
@ $42.44 · 2026-04-07
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $61.10 · 2025-12-29
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$500,080
@ $57.54 · 2025-12-22
COOK TIMOTHY D
Director
$2.95M
@ $58.97 · 2025-12-22
KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
Director
$1.00M
@ $62.09 · 2025-11-07
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$502,756
@ $58.46 · 2025-04-04
ROGERS JOHN W JR
Director
$191,624
@ $76.65 · 2024-12-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NKE
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.28M
MCCARTNEY PHILIP
Officer
$803,440
@ $46.18 · 2026-06-12
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$565,021
@ $62.33 · 2026-02-12
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$5.58M
@ $64.80 · 2025-11-14
HEINLE TREASURE
Officer
$306,461
@ $71.27 · 2025-10-06
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$52,367
@ $75.13 · 2025-10-02
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$76,058
@ $74.64 · 2025-09-05
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$6.54M
@ $75.93 · 2025-08-14
MCCARTNEY PHILIP
Officer
$244,138
@ $77.21 · 2025-08-13
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$123,152
@ $74.91 · 2025-08-05
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$7.95M
@ $72.29 · 2025-07-16
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$9.49M
@ $62.05 · 2025-05-14
NIELSEN JOHANNA
Officer
$7,978
@ $57.81 · 2025-04-24
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$12.36M
@ $72.83 · 2025-02-14
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$328,082
@ $72.81 · 2025-02-13
O NEILL HEIDI
Officer
$1.01M
@ $71.18 · 2025-02-11
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$3.46M
@ $76.64 · 2024-11-14
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$4.09M
@ $78.00 · 2024-08-14
FRIEND MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$394,281
@ $72.88 · 2024-08-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VZ
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.35M
HAMMOCK SAMANTHA
Officer
$3.50M
@ $47.83 · 2026-05-29
STILLWELL MARY-LEE
Officer
$428,450
@ $50.00 · 2026-03-02
RUSSO JOSEPH J.
Officer
$429,906
@ $44.88 · 2026-02-02
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$438,101
@ $43.81 · 2025-05-08
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$396,900
@ $44.10 · 2025-05-07
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$329,062
@ $43.87 · 2025-04-30
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$430,240
@ $43.02 · 2025-04-24
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$212,425
@ $42.48 · 2025-04-23
VENKATESH VANDANA
Officer
$437,939
@ $43.79 · 2025-02-25
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$261,623
@ $39.70 · 2025-02-04
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$319,080
@ $39.88 · 2025-02-03
MALADY KYLE
Chief Executive Officer
$453,155
@ $40.88 · 2025-01-29
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$809,800
@ $40.49 · 2025-01-28
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$810,800
@ $40.54 · 2025-01-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NKE
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VZ
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NKE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
VZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View NKE Full AnalysisView VZ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NKE vs VZ

Is NIKE, Inc. or Verizon Communications Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NKE trades at a 74.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $164 vs. price $42), compared to VZ's -42.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $33 vs. $47).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, NIKE, Inc. or Verizon Communications Inc.?

NKE scores 71/100 (Wide moat), while VZ scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Verizon Communications Inc. in financial distress?

VZ's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NKE scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, NIKE, Inc. or Verizon Communications Inc.?

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) generates a 8.9% free cash flow yield, compared to NIKE, Inc.'s 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NIKE, Inc. or Verizon Communications Inc.?

NKE earns 17.9% ROIC versus VZ's 8.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, NIKE, Inc.'s or Verizon Communications Inc.'s?

VZ's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to NKE's 34/100 (Unsafe). VZ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

NKE vs VZ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io