Compare StocksNEM vs UNH

Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

NEM
Newmont Corporation
$108.62
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78

Rewards

NEM
  • Gross margin of 67.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 88.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.54 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

NEM
  • Share count has increased by 37% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $2.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NEM
UNH
Valuation
$9.80B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
8.46%
FCF Yield
5.28%
14.09
Trailing P/E
27.85
9.58
Forward P/E
17.77
Quality & Moat
29.80%
ROIC
15.60%
20.19%
ROE
11.45%
67.36%
Gross Margin
18.80%
0.18
PEG Ratio
39.79
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Debt / Equity
0.74
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.96%
Dividend Yield
2.40%
NEM: 9Ties: 1UNH: 2
NEMUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NEM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NEM
$16.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$71.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NEM
34.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $108.62
Fair Value: $166.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
9.6% Overvalued
Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.78
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NEM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

+4.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.1%

The market implies +4.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NEM
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NEM
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NEM
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 82.3%Retail & Other 17.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,469
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NEM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CONGER HARRY M IV
Director
$400,335
@ $42.15 · 2024-11-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NEM
6
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.79M
TOTH PETER
Officer
$339,270
@ $113.09 · 2026-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$324,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-03-18
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$164,382
@ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$268,968
@ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$577,590
@ $130.00 · 2026-02-27
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$643,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-25
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$192,109
@ $92.36 · 2025-12-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$406,700
@ $81.34 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$168,397
@ $80.96 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$176,779
@ $84.99 · 2025-10-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$154,923
@ $74.59 · 2025-09-02
TABOLT BRIAN
Officer
$477,160
@ $68.02 · 2025-08-06
TOTH PETER
Officer
$190,980
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$132,222
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$176,250
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$122,024
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$162,270
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$112,345
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$154,440
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$106,924
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$145,380
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$100,651
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$131,130
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$340,894
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$90,786
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$128,670
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$386,010
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$89,083
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$120,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$83,080
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
TOTH PETER
Officer
$124,770
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$374,310
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$540,670
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$136,350
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$590,850
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$161,430
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$157,410
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
CAGE JOSHUA
Officer
$49,150
@ $49.15 · 2024-08-14
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$990,250
@ $49.51 · 2024-08-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$547,690
@ $42.13 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NEM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NEM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View NEM Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis
NEM vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io