Compare StocksNDAQ vs UNH

Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
$92.65
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$367.35

Rewards

NDAQ
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.09 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.83 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

NDAQ
  • Share count has increased by 16% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $21.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NDAQ
UNH
Valuation
$1.56B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
2.98%
FCF Yield
5.30%
27.91
Trailing P/E
27.75
20.94
Forward P/E
17.70
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
15.60%
14.85%
ROE
11.45%
100.00%
Gross Margin
18.80%
0.83
PEG Ratio
39.64
Balance Sheet Safety
0.79
Debt / Equity
0.74
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.79
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
1.23%
Dividend Yield
2.40%
NDAQ: 3Ties: 2UNH: 7
NDAQUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NDAQ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NDAQ
$10.58
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.38B
Δ Market Cap
+$25.19B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NDAQ
24.6% Overvalued
Price is 24.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $92.65
Fair Value: $74.38
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
9.2% Overvalued
Price is 9.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $367.35
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NDAQ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $93?

+15.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.9%

The market implies +15.1% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +16.9%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $367?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NDAQ
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NDAQ
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NDAQ
Insiders 10.9%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 1.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,518
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NDAQ
2
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.79M
TORGEBY JOHAN
Director
$958,320
@ $79.86 · 2026-02-17
INVESTOR AB
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$15.84M
@ $79.18 · 2026-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NDAQ
7
Sells (3M)
25
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $84.66M
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Chief Technology Officer
$700,222
@ $90.82 · 2026-04-28
TAL COHEN
Officer
$1.41M
@ $90.75 · 2026-04-27
DALY MICHELLE LYNN
Officer
$117,513
@ $88.82 · 2026-04-24
FRIEDMAN ADENA T
Chief Executive Officer
$9.71M
@ $85.44 · 2026-04-01
FRIEDMAN ADENA T
Chief Executive Officer
$8.36M
@ $90.08 · 2026-03-06
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$523,440
@ $87.24 · 2026-03-02
DALY MICHELLE LYNN
Officer
$352,934
@ $81.34 · 2026-02-19
FRIEDMAN ADENA T
Chief Executive Officer
$29.07M
@ $96.91 · 2026-02-02
ZECCA JOHN
Officer
$450,045
@ $100.01 · 2026-01-06
FRIEDMAN ADENA T
Chief Executive Officer
$28.92M
@ $96.39 · 2026-01-02
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$190,650
@ $90.57 · 2025-12-01
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$419,611
@ $90.57 · 2025-12-01
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$179,767
@ $85.40 · 2025-11-03
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$185,703
@ $88.22 · 2025-10-01
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$196,228
@ $93.22 · 2025-09-02
BEGLEY CHARLENE T
Director
$289,800
@ $96.60 · 2025-08-04
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$201,006
@ $95.49 · 2025-08-01
DALY MICHELLE LYNN
Officer
$812,174
@ $93.45 · 2025-07-25
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.02M
@ $88.87 · 2025-07-02
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$187,703
@ $89.17 · 2025-07-01
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$178,840
@ $85.00 · 2025-06-06
GRIGGS P C NELSON
Officer
$340,880
@ $85.22 · 2025-06-06
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$87,694
@ $83.28 · 2025-06-02
GRIGGS P C NELSON
Officer
$664,240
@ $83.03 · 2025-05-27
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$85,841
@ $81.52 · 2025-05-12
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$47,179
@ $71.81 · 2025-04-04
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$237,078
@ $75.70 · 2025-04-02
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Chief Investment Officer
$174,646
@ $75.67 · 2025-04-02
YOUNGWOOD SARAH
Officer
$1.10M
@ $73.68 · 2025-03-17
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$289,730
@ $82.78 · 2025-03-03
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Officer
$1.36M
@ $79.79 · 2025-02-26
TAL COHEN
Officer
$749,981
@ $83.75 · 2025-02-06
SMITH BRYAN EVERARD
Officer
$285,460
@ $81.56 · 2025-02-03
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$976,485
@ $80.88 · 2024-12-09
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$950,906
@ $78.75 · 2024-11-18
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Officer
$940,636
@ $79.58 · 2024-11-13
GRIGGS P C NELSON
Officer
$798,600
@ $79.86 · 2024-11-11
SKULE JEREMY
Officer
$935,040
@ $77.92 · 2024-11-06
GRIGGS P C NELSON
President
$444,086
@ $77.34 · 2024-11-06
TAL COHEN
Officer
$806,651
@ $74.11 · 2024-11-01
GRIGGS P C NELSON
Officer
$758,460
@ $75.85 · 2024-10-29
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Officer
$1.03M
@ $75.32 · 2024-10-28
ZECCA JOHN
Officer
$791,670
@ $71.97 · 2024-09-12
PETERSON BRADLEY J.
Officer
$2.71M
@ $67.79 · 2024-08-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NDAQ
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NDAQ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View NDAQ Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis
NDAQ vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io