Compare StocksNCLH vs ORCL

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, NCLH is overvalued at $20, with a DCF intrinsic value of $11 and a margin of safety of -90%. ORCL is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $285 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
$20.44
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.29

Rewards

NCLH
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • 7 insider purchases totaling $29.2M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.5x is 43% below the historical average of 29.1x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

NCLH
  • Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • High leverage (6.54x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (2.89x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $2.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NCLH
ORCL
Valuation
$-1.50B
Free Cash Flow
$-20.34B
-15.99%
FCF Yield
-3.84%
16.48
Trailing P/E
31.56
10.10
Forward P/E
16.89
Quality & Moat
4.50%
ROIC
9.68%
29.53%
ROE
53.38%
43.05%
Gross Margin
65.82%
0.97
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
6.54
Net Debt / Equity
2.89
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.07
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.92
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.09%
NCLH: 4Ties: 1ORCL: 7
NCLHORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NCLH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NCLH
$3.34
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NCLH
90.1% Overvalued
Price is 90.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $20.44
Fair Value: $10.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
35.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.29
Fair Value: $285.39
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NCLH

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NCLH
18/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NCLH
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NCLH
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 98.5%Retail & Other 1.0%
No. of Institutional Holders871
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.0%Retail & Other 15.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,512
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NCLH
7
Buys (3M)
14
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $30.93M
PAGLIUCA STEPHEN G
Director
$24.99M
@ $18.11 · 2026-06-02
CHIDSEY JOHN W
Chief Executive Officer
$2.50M
@ $16.37 · 2026-05-22
COHEN JONATHAN Z
Director
$474,900
@ $15.83 · 2026-05-20
CIL JOSE E
Director
$225,350
@ $15.02 · 2026-05-19
MACDONALD BRIAN P
Director
$248,100
@ $16.54 · 2026-05-11
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$521,394
@ $17.69 · 2026-05-07
LANSBERRY KEVIN ALLEN
Director
$196,992
@ $17.28 · 2026-05-07
DAHLGREN PATRIK
Officer
$99,578
@ $17.94 · 2025-11-25
CURTIS HARRY C
Director
$96,250
@ $19.25 · 2025-11-07
MONTAGUE JASON M
Officer
$252,020
@ $18.81 · 2025-11-06
SOMMER HARRY J
Officer and Director
$462,932
@ $18.52 · 2025-11-06
DAVID STELLA JULIE
Director
$129,870
@ $18.59 · 2025-11-06
KEMPA MARK A.
Chief Financial Officer
$197,051
@ $18.53 · 2025-11-06
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$525,335
@ $18.11 · 2025-11-06
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$197,060
@ $24.85 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NCLH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $110,250
ASHBY FAYE L
Officer
$110,250
@ $21.00 · 2025-12-12
ASHBY FAYE L
Officer
$1.05M
@ $27.30 · 2024-11-08
DEMARCO ANDREA
Officer
$805,057
@ $27.76 · 2024-11-06
KEMPA MARK A.
Chief Financial Officer
$417,918
@ $27.86 · 2024-11-06
FARKAS DANIELS S.
General Counsel
$1.16M
@ $24.72 · 2024-11-04
SOMMER HARRY J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.47M
@ $24.67 · 2024-11-04
FARKAS DANIELS S.
General Counsel
$542,760
@ $18.09 · 2024-08-27
SOMMER HARRY J
Chief Executive Officer
$452,358
@ $18.09 · 2024-08-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.89B
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NCLH
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NCLH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
View NCLH Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NCLH vs ORCL

Is Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $285 vs. price $184), compared to NCLH's -90.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $11 vs. $20).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while NCLH scores 18/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. in financial distress?

NCLH's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. or Oracle Corporation?

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) generates a -3.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s -16.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL earns 9.7% ROIC versus NCLH's 4.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

NCLH vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io