Compare StocksMTCH vs PFE

Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MTCH is undervalued at $39, with a DCF intrinsic value of $10854833595 and a margin of safety of 100%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

MTCH
Match Group, Inc.
$39.41
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

MTCH
  • Match Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 73.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Match Group, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

MTCH
  • Altman Z-Score of -0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MTCH
PFE
Valuation
$811.33M
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
15.04
Trailing P/E
19.09
9.39
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
18.58%
ROIC
10.19%
N/A
ROE
8.31%
73.88%
Gross Margin
74.80%
0.36
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.75
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
2.03%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
MTCH: 3Ties: 2PFE: 4
MTCHPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MTCH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MTCH
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.2
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MTCH
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $39.41
Fair Value: $10854833594.64
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MTCH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $39?

-12.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -16.6%

The market implies -12.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -16.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MTCH
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MTCH
-3.05
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MTCH
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 108.6%
No. of Institutional Holders804
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MTCH
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $943,552
RASCOFF SPENCER MARC
Chief Executive Officer
$445,691
@ $31.84 · 2025-11-20
RASCOFF SPENCER MARC
Chief Executive Officer
$497,861
@ $37.57 · 2025-08-26
RASCOFF SPENCER MARC
Chief Executive Officer
$1.99M
@ $28.05 · 2025-05-09
SCHIFFMAN GLENN H
Director
$103,410
@ $34.47 · 2025-02-06
RASCOFF SPENCER MARC
Chief Executive Officer
$2.05M
@ $34.41 · 2025-02-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MTCH
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.87M
BRENNER MELISSA ANNE
Director
$184,761
@ $35.94 · 2026-05-08
HOSSEINI HESAM
Chief Operating Officer
$1.78M
@ $30.13 · 2026-03-06
EIGENMANN PHILIP D
Officer
$245,024
@ $37.52 · 2025-09-03
MCDANIEL ANN L
Director
$203,774
@ $37.58 · 2025-08-27
BAILEY STEPHEN
Director
$458,951
@ $36.72 · 2025-08-07
SWIDLER GARY
President
$7.96M
@ $32.86 · 2025-03-07
BAILEY STEPHEN
Director
$25,320
@ $31.61 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MTCH
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MTCH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View MTCH Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MTCH vs PFE

Is Match Group, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to MTCH's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $10854833595 vs. $39).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Match Group, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

MTCH scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Match Group, Inc. in financial distress?

MTCH's Altman Z-Score of -0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Match Group, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

MTCH earns 18.6% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Match Group, Inc.'s or Pfizer, Inc.'s?

MTCH's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). MTCH has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

MTCH vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io