Compare StocksMSFT vs VTR

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Ventas, Inc. (VTR)

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$414.19
VS
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
$88.02

Rewards

MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
VTR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

MSFT
  • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
VTR
  • PEG ratio of 16.00 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.78 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MSFT
VTR
Valuation
$71.61B
Free Cash Flow
$1.48B
2.33%
FCF Yield
3.47%
24.68
Trailing P/E
160.04
21.46
Forward P/E
97.08
Quality & Moat
21.58%
ROIC
2.53%
24.58%
ROE
1.85%
68.31%
Gross Margin
40.49%
1.05
PEG Ratio
16.00
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Debt / Equity
0.94
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.26
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.48
0.88%
Dividend Yield
2.36%
MSFT: 9Ties: 1VTR: 2
MSFTVTR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

VTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VTR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.03B
Δ Market Cap
+$18.74B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MSFT
3.0% Overvalued
Price is 3.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $414.19
Fair Value: $402.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VTR
646.3% Overvalued
Price is 646.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $88.02
Fair Value: $11.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+13.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +13.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +18.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

VTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $88?

+41.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.2%

The market implies +41.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VTR
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VTR
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 24.0%
No. of Institutional Holders8,016
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VTR
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 103.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,362
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VTR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $172.43M
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$235,535
@ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.64M
@ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VTR
2
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $84.88M
ROBERTS CAREY SHEA
General Counsel
$3.02M
@ $85.00 · 2026-02-11
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$848,751
@ $82.23 · 2026-02-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$801,605
@ $77.66 · 2026-02-02
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.31M
@ $77.25 · 2026-01-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$797,475
@ $77.26 · 2026-01-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$831,419
@ $80.55 · 2025-12-01
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$400,205
@ $80.04 · 2025-11-19
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $79.01 · 2025-11-17
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.58M
@ $76.77 · 2025-11-12
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$3,028
@ $75.70 · 2025-11-07
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$372,256
@ $75.05 · 2025-11-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $75.19 · 2025-11-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$25.08M
@ $74.22 · 2025-11-03
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.66M
@ $71.32 · 2025-10-20
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$322,215
@ $70.14 · 2025-10-01
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$724,986
@ $70.24 · 2025-10-01
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$28,419
@ $70.00 · 2025-09-15
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$699,864
@ $67.80 · 2025-09-02
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $68.49 · 2025-08-04
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$695,722
@ $67.40 · 2025-08-01
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$266,960
@ $68.45 · 2025-07-31
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.95M
@ $66.29 · 2025-07-21
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$271,454
@ $66.24 · 2025-07-18
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$287,976
@ $65.82 · 2025-07-18
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $65.60 · 2025-07-16
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$11.00M
@ $65.36 · 2025-07-14
ROBERTS CAREY SHEA
General Counsel
$1.51M
@ $64.23 · 2025-05-30
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $65.22 · 2025-05-27
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.50M
@ $64.59 · 2025-05-21
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$93,026
@ $63.76 · 2025-05-14
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$682,135
@ $66.09 · 2025-05-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $71.06 · 2025-04-03
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.97M
@ $69.15 · 2025-03-04
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.30M
@ $68.21 · 2025-02-25
LIEBBE GREGORY R
Officer
$243,558
@ $63.00 · 2025-02-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VTR
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
VTR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View MSFT Full AnalysisView VTR Full Analysis
MSFT vs VTR: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io