Compare StocksMSFT vs STT

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs State Street Corporation (STT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MSFT is undervalued at $496, with a DCF intrinsic value of $752 and a margin of safety of 34%. STT is undervalued at $183, with an intrinsic value of $695 and a margin of safety of 74%. Of the two, STT has the wider margin of safety.

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$495.89
VS
STT
State Street Corporation
$183.19

Rewards

MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 67.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
STT
  • State Street Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 20% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.70 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

MSFT
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $71.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
STT
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.2x is 30% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MSFT
STT
Valuation
$66.99B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.82%
FCF Yield
N/A
27.64
Trailing P/E
16.18
21.02
Forward P/E
11.96
Quality & Moat
20.70%
ROIC
7.09%
34.04%
ROE
12.44%
67.94%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.59
PEG Ratio
0.70
Balance Sheet Safety
0.12
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.80%
Dividend Yield
2.01%
MSFT: 3Ties: 1STT: 4
MSFTSTT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

STT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MSFT
$3.53
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$251.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$888.25B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STT
$2.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.45B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MSFT
34.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $495.89
Fair Value: $751.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STT
73.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 73.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $183.19
Fair Value: $694.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $496?

+12.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.7%

The market implies +12.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +21.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

STT

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MSFT
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MSFT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STT
-2.42
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders8,175
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STT
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 94.8%Retail & Other 4.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,699
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $312,475
PORTER BRIAN J
Director
$312,475
@ $124.99 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Director
$10,551
@ $75.36 · 2024-10-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $114.57M
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$20.76M
@ $498.27 · 2026-09-14
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$43.39M
@ $501.46 · 2026-09-01
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$4.88M
@ $487.89 · 2026-08-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.39M
@ $496.52 · 2026-08-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STT
4
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.10M
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$90,595
@ $181.19 · 2026-08-03
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.80M
@ $184.52 · 2026-07-24
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.68M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.02M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$895,290
@ $162.78 · 2026-06-11
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$243,210
@ $162.14 · 2026-06-08
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.26M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.43M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$75,435
@ $150.87 · 2026-05-13
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$461,670
@ $153.89 · 2026-04-22
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$1.47M
@ $152.93 · 2026-04-22
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$2.00M
@ $124.32 · 2026-03-11
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $125.70 · 2026-03-02
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$319,775
@ $127.91 · 2026-02-24
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$721,420
@ $127.10 · 2026-02-23
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$1.12M
@ $128.00 · 2026-02-23
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$672,890
@ $118.55 · 2025-11-28
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$175,860
@ $117.24 · 2025-10-27
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$115,170
@ $115.17 · 2025-08-26
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $112.39 · 2025-08-21
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$175,046
@ $111.07 · 2025-08-19
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$108,197
@ $109.29 · 2025-07-22
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.07M
@ $96.61 · 2025-05-30
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$70,530
@ $94.04 · 2025-05-09
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$117,936
@ $90.72 · 2025-05-06
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,725
@ $90.43 · 2025-05-02
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.03M
@ $88.83 · 2025-05-01
BISEGNA ANTHONY C.
Officer
$310,590
@ $88.74 · 2025-05-01
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$1.94M
@ $98.24 · 2025-02-28
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$288,202
@ $100.07 · 2025-02-19
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$802,479
@ $99.96 · 2025-02-18
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$368,536
@ $99.47 · 2025-02-18
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.22M
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$146,955
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
MILROD DONNA M
Officer
$9,631
@ $95.36 · 2024-11-18
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.27M
@ $91.32 · 2024-10-18
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$46,250
@ $92.50 · 2024-10-17
HUNG YIE-HSIN
Chief Executive Officer
$325,500
@ $93.00 · 2024-10-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
STT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View MSFT Full AnalysisView STT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MSFT vs STT

Is Microsoft Corporation or State Street Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, STT trades at a 73.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $695 vs. price $183), compared to MSFT's 34.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $752 vs. $496).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Microsoft Corporation or State Street Corporation?

MSFT scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while STT scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is State Street Corporation in financial distress?

STT's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MSFT scores 8.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Microsoft Corporation or State Street Corporation?

MSFT earns 20.7% ROIC versus STT's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Microsoft Corporation's or State Street Corporation's?

STT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MSFT's 94/100 (Very Safe). STT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.