Compare StocksMSFT vs SCHW

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MSFT is undervalued at $465, with a DCF intrinsic value of $724 and a margin of safety of 36%. SCHW is undervalued at $105, with an intrinsic value of $272 and a margin of safety of 61%. Of the two, SCHW has the wider margin of safety.

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$464.72
VS
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$105.24

Rewards

MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 67.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SCHW
  • Gross margin of 97.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 100.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.89 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

MSFT
  • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $10.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
SCHW
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.41 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $7.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MSFT
SCHW
Valuation
$66.99B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.94%
FCF Yield
N/A
25.90
Trailing P/E
19.17
19.96
Forward P/E
13.44
Quality & Moat
20.70%
ROIC
12.23%
34.04%
ROE
20.28%
67.94%
Gross Margin
97.50%
1.52
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
0.12
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.78%
Dividend Yield
1.22%
MSFT: 2Ties: 1SCHW: 6
MSFTSCHW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SCHW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MSFT
$2.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$251.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$656.75B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SCHW
$1.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$12.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MSFT
35.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $464.72
Fair Value: $724.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SCHW
61.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.24
Fair Value: $272.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $465?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SCHW

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MSFT
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SCHW
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MSFT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SCHW
-2.16
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.2%
No. of Institutional Holders8,079
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SCHW
Insiders 6.2%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,973
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SCHW
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.85M
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.85M
@ $84.23 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $121.03M
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SCHW
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.52M
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$2.94M
@ $105.01 · 2026-07-28
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$3.43M
@ $104.01 · 2026-07-27
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$709,341
@ $102.03 · 2026-07-23
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$422,069
@ $104.14 · 2026-07-21
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$4.09M
@ $99.00 · 2026-04-14
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$956,228
@ $94.60 · 2026-03-03
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$681,454
@ $94.61 · 2026-03-03
HOWARD DENNIS
Officer
$2.65M
@ $95.02 · 2026-02-25
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$792,796
@ $104.38 · 2026-02-02
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$4.85M
@ $97.00 · 2025-08-27
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $99.16 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.36M
@ $97.91 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$1.88M
@ $90.01 · 2025-06-18
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.21M
@ $88.20 · 2025-05-28
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$889,295
@ $87.39 · 2025-05-22
RUFFEL CHARLES ANTHONY
Director
$486,986
@ $87.65 · 2025-05-21
BETTINGER WALTER W II
Chairman of the Board
$17.05M
@ $89.00 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SCHW
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
SCHW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View MSFT Full AnalysisView SCHW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MSFT vs SCHW

Is Microsoft Corporation or The Charles Schwab Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SCHW trades at a 61.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $272 vs. price $105), compared to MSFT's 35.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $724 vs. $465).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Microsoft Corporation or The Charles Schwab Corporation?

MSFT scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while SCHW scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Charles Schwab Corporation in financial distress?

SCHW's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MSFT scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Microsoft Corporation or The Charles Schwab Corporation?

MSFT earns 20.7% ROIC versus SCHW's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Microsoft Corporation's or The Charles Schwab Corporation's?

MSFT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SCHW's 88/100 (Very Safe). MSFT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.