Compare StocksMSFT vs ROP

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MSFT is fairly valued at $379, with a DCF intrinsic value of $440 and a margin of safety of 14%. ROP is undervalued at $330, with an intrinsic value of $422 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, ROP has the wider margin of safety.

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$379.40
VS
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$330.25

Rewards

MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROP
  • Gross margin of 69.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.6x is 31% below the historical average of 29.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

MSFT
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $10.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
ROP
  • FCF yield of 6.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MSFT
ROP
Valuation
$71.61B
Free Cash Flow
$2.17B
2.54%
FCF Yield
6.51%
22.61
Trailing P/E
20.62
19.61
Forward P/E
13.86
Quality & Moat
21.58%
ROIC
5.95%
34.01%
ROE
9.01%
68.31%
Gross Margin
69.40%
1.22
PEG Ratio
1.38
Balance Sheet Safety
0.11
Net Debt / Equity
0.54
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.26
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.16
0.92%
Dividend Yield
1.05%
MSFT: 6Ties: 2ROP: 4
MSFTROP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROP
$0.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MSFT
13.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $379.40
Fair Value: $439.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROP
21.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $330.25
Fair Value: $421.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $379?

+12.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.1%

The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +17.1%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

ROP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $330?

+6.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.7%

The market implies +6.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROP
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROP
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders8,114
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROP
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 104.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,617
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROP
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.57M
JOYCE THOMAS PATRICK JR
Director
$501,844
@ $358.46 · 2026-02-06
BRINKLEY AMY WOODS
Director
$540,856
@ $450.71 · 2025-11-12
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$4.52M
@ $452.23 · 2025-11-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $121.03M
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROP
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.23M
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.67M
@ $445.56 · 2025-12-01
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$13.31M
@ $443.57 · 2025-11-11
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$210,158
@ $525.39 · 2025-08-15
STIPANCICH JOHN K
General Counsel
$846,255
@ $564.17 · 2025-07-23
WALLMAN RICHARD F.
Director
$195,800
@ $556.25 · 2025-07-22
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
Director
$200,277
@ $572.22 · 2025-05-05
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.76M
@ $588.19 · 2025-02-25
CROSS BRANDON L
Officer
$433,372
@ $577.83 · 2025-02-04
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.73M
@ $578.05 · 2025-01-31
STIPANCICH JOHN K
General Counsel
$578,040
@ $578.04 · 2025-01-31
WALLMAN RICHARD F.
Director
$201,913
@ $575.25 · 2025-01-31
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$528,092
@ $561.80 · 2024-12-03
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$17.17M
@ $572.47 · 2024-11-08
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
Director
$387,366
@ $568.82 · 2024-11-08
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$415,335
@ $553.78 · 2024-09-13
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$77,048
@ $550.34 · 2024-07-26
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.97M
@ $563.02 · 2024-06-20
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
Director
$220,696
@ $551.74 · 2024-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MSFT
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROP
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
ROP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View MSFT Full AnalysisView ROP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MSFT vs ROP

Is Microsoft Corporation or Roper Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ROP trades at a 21.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $422 vs. price $330), compared to MSFT's 13.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $440 vs. $379).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Microsoft Corporation or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

MSFT scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while ROP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Microsoft Corporation or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) generates a 6.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Microsoft Corporation's 2.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Microsoft Corporation or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

MSFT earns 21.6% ROIC versus ROP's 6.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Microsoft Corporation's or Roper Technologies, Inc.'s?

ROP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MSFT's 94/100 (Very Safe). ROP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.