Compare StocksMSFT vs Q

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$389.02
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$111.94

Rewards

MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
Q

    Risks

    MSFT
    • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      Q
      Valuation
      $71.61B
      Free Cash Flow
      $776.50M
      2.48%
      FCF Yield
      3.31%
      24.33
      Trailing P/E
      33.92
      20.64
      Forward P/E
      25.33
      Quality & Moat
      22.10%
      ROIC
      6.45%
      26.05%
      ROE
      9.39%
      68.59%
      Gross Margin
      46.17%
      0.41
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.32
      Debt / Equity
      0.61
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.19
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.58
      0.94%
      Dividend Yield
      0.13%
      MSFT: 9Ties: 1Q: 1
      MSFTQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MSFT

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      $9.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $196.68B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$1.81T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      0.5% Overvalued
      Price is 0.5% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $389.02
      Fair Value: $387.10
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      17.4% Overvalued
      Price is 17.4% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $111.94
      Fair Value: $95.35
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MSFT

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $389?

      +12.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +17.4%

      The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

      Standard FCF implies +17.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

      +16.9%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.3%

      The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      88/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      -2.51
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.0%Retail & Other 23.9%
      No. of Institutional Holders8,055
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,227
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      1
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $3.44M
      STANTON JOHN W.
      Director
      $1.99M
      @ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
      SMITH BRADFORD LEE
      President
      $1.45M
      @ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      0
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $329,572
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      1
      Sells (3M)
      13
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $172.43M
      HOGAN KATHLEEN T
      Officer
      $5.05M
      @ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
      ALTHOFF JUDSON
      Officer
      $6.27M
      @ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
      SMITH BRADFORD LEE
      President
      $19.97M
      @ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
      NADELLA SATYA
      Chief Executive Officer
      $75.32M
      @ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $2.56M
      @ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $1.39M
      @ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $460,008
      @ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
      HOGAN KATHLEEN T
      Officer
      $9.76M
      @ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
      ALTHOFF JUDSON
      Officer
      $7.33M
      @ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
      COLEMAN AMY
      Officer
      $5.99M
      @ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
      SMITH BRADFORD LEE
      President
      $1.68M
      @ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
      SMITH BRADFORD LEE
      President
      $35.30M
      @ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $874,634
      @ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
      ALTHOFF JUDSON
      Officer
      $10.43M
      @ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $414,720
      @ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
      YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
      Officer
      $3.05M
      @ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
      HOGAN KATHLEEN T
      Officer
      $7.16M
      @ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $1.03M
      @ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
      SMITH BRADFORD LEE
      President
      $16.10M
      @ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
      HOOD AMY E
      Chief Financial Officer
      $15.60M
      @ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
      NADELLA SATYA
      Chief Executive Officer
      $32.02M
      @ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
      NUMOTO TAKESHI
      Officer
      $235,535
      @ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
      ALTHOFF JUDSON
      Officer
      $10.64M
      @ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $828,193
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(43/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MSFT
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      View MSFT Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis