Compare Stocks › MSFT vs NTRS

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, MSFT is undervalued at $522, with a DCF intrinsic value of $802 and a margin of safety of 35%. NTRS is fairly valued at $169, with an intrinsic value of $195 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, MSFT has the wider margin of safety.

MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$521.91
VS
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
$169.16

Rewards

MSFT
  • ★Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 67.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Microsoft Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
NTRS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 41.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.54 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

MSFT
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $73.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
NTRS
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.27 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MSFT
NTRS
Valuation
$66.99B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.73%
FCF Yield
N/A
27.24
Trailing P/E
13.27
21.62
Forward P/E
12.97
Quality & Moat
22.53%
ROIC
15.47%
34.22%
ROE
18.44%
67.66%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.69
PEG Ratio
0.93
Balance Sheet Safety
0.15
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.34
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.75%
Dividend Yield
2.08%
MSFT: 3Ties: 1NTRS: 4
MSFTNTRS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NTRS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MSFT
$4.30
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$251.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.08T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NTRS
$2.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MSFT
34.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $521.91
Fair Value: $801.72
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NTRS
13.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $169.16
Fair Value: $195.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $522?

+13.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.5%

The market implies +13.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +22.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NTRS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MSFT
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NTRS
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MSFT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NTRS
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders8,181
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NTRS
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 12.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,400
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NTRS
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $769,611
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$45,790
@ $179.57 · 2026-07-29
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$37,442
@ $166.41 · 2026-05-01
PETRINO RICHARD
Director
$148,910
@ $148.91 · 2026-02-05
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$37,203
@ $151.85 · 2026-02-02
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$500,266
@ $128.57 · 2025-11-04
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$34,198
@ $126.66 · 2025-10-27
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$32,343
@ $126.34 · 2025-08-13
MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
Director
$10,261
@ $91.62 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $118.56M
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$3.98M
@ $545.42 · 2026-10-13
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$20.76M
@ $498.27 · 2026-09-14
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$43.39M
@ $501.46 · 2026-09-01
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$4.88M
@ $487.89 · 2026-08-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.39M
@ $496.52 · 2026-08-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NTRS
2
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.68M
LEVY SUSAN COHEN
General Counsel
$3.52M
@ $168.25 · 2026-10-26
SOUTH THOMAS A
Officer
$332,820
@ $184.90 · 2026-08-24
HALLINAN AENGUS
Officer
$613,880
@ $167.36 · 2026-06-03
BELLOWS CLIVE
Officer
$462,056
@ $165.02 · 2026-04-24
GIBSON GUY
Officer
$428,452
@ $142.39 · 2026-03-05
FOX DAVID W JR
Chief Financial Officer
$468,362
@ $143.89 · 2026-03-04
FOX DAVID W JR
Chief Financial Officer
$208,872
@ $144.05 · 2026-02-25
BELLOWS CLIVE
Officer
$166,758
@ $145.26 · 2026-02-12
GIBSON GUY
Officer
$153,769
@ $147.43 · 2026-02-12
SOUTH THOMAS A
Officer
$695,150
@ $139.03 · 2025-12-11
LANDERS JOHN P.
Officer
$95,252
@ $124.35 · 2025-11-17
LEVY SUSAN COHEN
General Counsel
$3.54M
@ $128.13 · 2025-11-04
PARKER TERESA A
Officer
$997,458
@ $131.21 · 2025-07-31
HALLINAN AENGUS
Officer
$528.00
@ $105.60 · 2025-05-22
CONWAY KELLEY
Officer
$52,640
@ $105.28 · 2025-05-12
FOX DAVID W JR
Chief Financial Officer
$535,772
@ $105.55 · 2025-05-12
PARKER TERESA A
Officer
$650,710
@ $100.62 · 2025-05-09
BELLOWS CLIVE
Officer
$329,835
@ $99.95 · 2025-05-08
SOUTH THOMAS A
Officer
$429,852
@ $113.00 · 2025-02-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NTRS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MSFT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
NTRS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View MSFT Full AnalysisView NTRS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MSFT vs NTRS

Is Microsoft Corporation or Northern Trust Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MSFT trades at a 34.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $802 vs. price $522), compared to NTRS's 13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $195 vs. $169).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Microsoft Corporation or Northern Trust Corporation?▼

MSFT scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while NTRS scores 54/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Northern Trust Corporation in financial distress?▼

NTRS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MSFT scores 9.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Microsoft Corporation or Northern Trust Corporation?▼

MSFT earns 22.5% ROIC versus NTRS's 15.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Microsoft Corporation's or Northern Trust Corporation's?▼

MSFT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to NTRS's 91/100 (Very Safe). MSFT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.