Compare StocksMS vs UBER

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)

MS
Morgan Stanley
$158.55
VS
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
$75.34

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.65 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.75 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
UBER
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 192.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.48 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

MS
  • High leverage (4.56x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $25.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UBER
  • FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
UBER
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$9.76B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.24%
15.53
Trailing P/E
15.93
12.89
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
3.43%
ROIC
12.57%
14.42%
ROE
35.80%
87.06%
Gross Margin
38.50%
0.75
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
4.56
Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.74
2.52%
Dividend Yield
N/A
MS: 2Ties: 2UBER: 3
MSUBER

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UBER

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UBER
$5.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$21.80B
Δ Market Cap
+$119.37B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
45.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 45.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $158.55
Fair Value: $290.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UBER
78.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 78.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $75.34
Fair Value: $345.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

UBER

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $75?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.1%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UBER
47/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UBER
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.0%Institutions 62.7%Retail & Other 13.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,182
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UBER
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,361
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UBER
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.60M
KRISHNAMURTHY BALAJI
Chief Financial Officer
$1.60M
@ $71.25 · 2026-02-24
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$465.00
@ $93.00 · 2025-10-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
7
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.45M
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$692,663
@ $99.61 · 2024-05-14
GORMAN JAMES P
Officer and Director
$9.02M
@ $90.21 · 2024-04-18
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.01M
@ $90.09 · 2024-04-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UBER
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.74M
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$2.23M
@ $74.45 · 2026-03-16
WEST, TONY
Officer
$251,125
@ $80.36 · 2025-12-18
WEST, TONY
Officer
$287,812
@ $92.10 · 2025-11-18
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$519,234
@ $94.41 · 2025-11-12
WEST, TONY
Officer
$290,625
@ $93.00 · 2025-10-20
KHOSROWSHAHI DARA
Chief Executive Officer
$15.07M
@ $100.48 · 2025-09-22
WEST, TONY
Officer
$10.04M
@ $100.38 · 2025-09-22
WEST, TONY
Officer
$293,562
@ $93.94 · 2025-09-18
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$273,405
@ $99.42 · 2025-09-16
KHOSROWSHAHI DARA
Chief Executive Officer
$28.61M
@ $95.37 · 2025-09-12
WEST, TONY
Officer
$296,875
@ $95.00 · 2025-08-26
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$3.01M
@ $96.42 · 2025-08-22
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$1.06M
@ $91.74 · 2025-08-15
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$261,250
@ $95.00 · 2025-07-07
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$3.00M
@ $86.03 · 2025-05-12
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$233,750
@ $85.00 · 2025-05-05
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$206,250
@ $75.00 · 2025-03-20
WEST, TONY
Officer
$3.31M
@ $70.59 · 2025-03-14
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$1.43M
@ $71.57 · 2025-03-14
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.51M
@ $81.02 · 2025-02-18
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.03M
@ $72.90 · 2024-11-25
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.88M
@ $72.00 · 2024-09-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UBER
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
UBER
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View MS Full AnalysisView UBER Full Analysis
Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io