Compare Stocks › MS vs TTWO

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, MS is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $314 and a margin of safety of 41%. TTWO is undervalued at $190, with an intrinsic value of $326 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, TTWO has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$184.30
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$190.17

Rewards

MS
  • ★Gross margin of 87.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TTWO

    Risks

    MS
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    TTWO
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠6 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    MS
    TTWO
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.26B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.53%
    14.62
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    13.50
    Forward P/E
    18.50
    Quality & Moat
    3.47%
    ROIC
    0.42%
    13.84%
    ROE
    -9.04%
    87.31%
    Gross Margin
    57.13%
    1.61
    PEG Ratio
    2.61
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.31
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.46
    2.50%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    MS: 7Ties: 1TTWO: 0
    MSTTWO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    MS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TTWO
    No data available for this metric.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    MS
    $6.65
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $20.84B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$138.59B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TTWO
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-8.52B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.07B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    MS
    41.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $184.30
    Fair Value: $313.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TTWO
    41.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $190.17
    Fair Value: $325.90
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    MS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TTWO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $190?

    +18.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.8%

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    MS
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TTWO
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    MS
    -2.09
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TTWO

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    MS
    Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.5%Retail & Other 12.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,458
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TTWO
    Insiders 1.8%Institutions 100.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,554
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    MS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    PETERSON DOUGLAS L
    Director
    $5,630
    @ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TTWO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    MS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $48.28M
    SCHAPIRO MARY L
    Director
    $212,055
    @ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $5.21M
    @ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $2.78M
    @ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $9.74M
    @ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $6.02M
    @ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
    YESHAYA SHARON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $3.97M
    @ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.44M
    @ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $5.57M
    @ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
    PICK EDWARD N.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.43M
    @ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $2.81M
    @ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.69M
    @ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $4.09M
    @ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $3.70M
    @ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
    HERZ ROBERT H
    Director
    $95,459
    @ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.80M
    @ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
    AKRAM RAJA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.52M
    @ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.20M
    @ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TTWO
    6
    Sells (3M)
    25
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.17M
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $98,586
    @ $203.69 · 2026-10-02
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $2.02M
    @ $202.39 · 2026-09-29
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $361,055
    @ $217.37 · 2026-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $290,563
    @ $217.65 · 2026-09-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $88,694
    @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $31,116
    @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $122,305
    @ $244.61 · 2026-06-22
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $230.00 · 2026-06-16
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $950,515
    @ $215.00 · 2026-06-15
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $107,608
    @ $215.22 · 2026-06-15
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $1.89M
    @ $214.00 · 2026-06-08
    DORNEMANN MICHAEL
    Director
    $249,790
    @ $217.02 · 2026-06-04
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $4.63M
    @ $219.61 · 2026-06-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $85,548
    @ $229.35 · 2026-06-01
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $28,592
    @ $218.26 · 2026-05-29
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $521,725
    @ $208.69 · 2026-03-09
    DORNEMANN MICHAEL
    Director
    $296,195
    @ $213.09 · 2026-03-05
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $248,906
    @ $213.47 · 2026-03-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $535,637
    @ $213.57 · 2026-03-02
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $522,525
    @ $209.01 · 2026-03-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $30,183
    @ $194.73 · 2026-02-18
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $399,953
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $274,658
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $321,664
    @ $238.27 · 2025-11-18
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $42,790
    @ $235.11 · 2025-11-17
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-09-08
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $239,570
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-04
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $474,110
    @ $238.73 · 2025-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.61M
    @ $230.64 · 2025-08-28
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $5.11M
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $528,868
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $11.16M
    @ $227.68 · 2025-08-21
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $46,227
    @ $233.47 · 2025-08-18
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $231,330
    @ $231.33 · 2025-08-15
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.95M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $6.09M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $45,106
    @ $225.53 · 2025-06-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $37,057
    @ $214.20 · 2025-03-06
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $175,118
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $121,885
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $7.02M
    @ $208.13 · 2025-02-25
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $262,197
    @ $187.95 · 2024-12-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,221
    @ $187.64 · 2024-12-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $818,545
    @ $176.79 · 2024-11-08
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $358,340
    @ $179.17 · 2024-11-08
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.76M
    @ $175.05 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    MS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TTWO
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    MS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    TTWO
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View MS Full AnalysisView TTWO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs TTWO

    Is Morgan Stanley or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTWO trades at a 41.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $326 vs. price $190), compared to MS's 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $314 vs. $184).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

    MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while TTWO scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?▼

    MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTWO scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

    MS earns 3.5% ROIC versus TTWO's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.