Compare StocksMS vs TPR

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Tapestry, Inc. (TPR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MS is undervalued at $223, with a DCF intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. TPR is overvalued at $144, with an intrinsic value of $23 and a margin of safety of -534%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17
VS
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$143.50

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TPR
  • Gross margin of 76.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Tapestry, Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TPR
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (4.18x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $6.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
TPR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.53B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.28%
20.21
Trailing P/E
43.62
17.56
Forward P/E
18.54
Quality & Moat
3.38%
ROIC
30.19%
16.39%
ROE
60.91%
87.39%
Gross Margin
76.18%
2.66
PEG Ratio
0.31
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
4.18
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
1.81%
Dividend Yield
1.06%
MS: 5Ties: 1TPR: 3
MSTPR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TPR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TPR
$16.88
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.03B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.40B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TPR
534.3% Overvalued
Price is 534.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $143.50
Fair Value: $22.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TPR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $144?

+31.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.3%

The market implies +31.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TPR
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TPR
-3.01
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TPR
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 98.0%Retail & Other 1.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,492
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TPR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TPR
2
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.08M
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$2.74M
@ $140.02 · 2026-05-26
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$3.69M
@ $132.89 · 2026-05-13
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$152,149
@ $156.05 · 2026-03-03
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$7.56M
@ $154.87 · 2026-02-18
GRECO THOMAS R
Director
$2.20M
@ $154.44 · 2026-02-17
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$329,492
@ $153.47 · 2026-02-11
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$6.76M
@ $152.62 · 2026-02-10
GATES ANNE
Director
$999,327
@ $153.79 · 2026-02-10
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$1.43M
@ $155.62 · 2026-02-10
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$6.03M
@ $151.34 · 2026-02-09
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$67,144
@ $115.17 · 2025-12-04
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$184,133
@ $110.19 · 2025-11-26
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$1.11M
@ $107.00 · 2025-11-24
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.97M
@ $104.85 · 2025-11-21
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$3.34M
@ $105.31 · 2025-11-21
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$2.98M
@ $102.83 · 2025-11-18
HOWARD DAVID E
Officer
$2.57M
@ $102.50 · 2025-11-18
LAU KA MING ALAN
Director
$1.20M
@ $106.19 · 2025-09-11
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$780,712
@ $99.05 · 2025-08-25
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$137,260
@ $82.29 · 2025-05-13
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$3.26M
@ $81.40 · 2025-05-12
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $84.71 · 2025-02-26
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$681,976
@ $87.59 · 2025-02-21
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $86.56 · 2025-02-20
HOWARD DAVID E
General Counsel
$1.05M
@ $88.00 · 2025-02-20
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$4.19M
@ $58.68 · 2024-11-25
HOWARD DAVID E
General Counsel
$2.48M
@ $58.95 · 2024-11-22
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$514,219
@ $57.96 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TPR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
TPR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View MS Full AnalysisView TPR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs TPR

Is Morgan Stanley or Tapestry, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $298 vs. price $223), compared to TPR's -534.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $23 vs. $144).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Tapestry, Inc.?

TPR scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TPR scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Tapestry, Inc.?

TPR earns 30.2% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or Tapestry, Inc.'s?

MS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to TPR's 54/100 (Borderline). MS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.