Compare StocksMS vs TMUS

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MS is undervalued at $210, with a DCF intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. TMUS is undervalued at $173, with an intrinsic value of $339 and a margin of safety of 49%. Of the two, TMUS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42
VS
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
$172.71

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TMUS
  • Gross margin of 63.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.64 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
TMUS
  • High leverage (2.09x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
TMUS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$15.43B
N/A
FCF Yield
8.33%
17.01
Trailing P/E
18.05
15.45
Forward P/E
11.96
Quality & Moat
3.68%
ROIC
10.40%
14.08%
ROE
17.99%
87.64%
Gross Margin
63.05%
1.99
PEG Ratio
0.80
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
2.09
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.42
2.19%
Dividend Yield
2.36%
MS: 3Ties: 1TMUS: 5
MSTMUS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TMUS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TMUS
$2.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$52.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TMUS
49.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 49.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $172.71
Fair Value: $339.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TMUS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $173?

+10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.5%

The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TMUS
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TMUS
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TMUS
Insiders 55.5%Institutions 44.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,283
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TMUS
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.98M
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Officer
$1.00M
@ $196.20 · 2026-05-01
GOPALAN SRINI
Chief Executive Officer
$1.98M
@ $201.82 · 2025-11-06
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$12,446
@ $188.58 · 2024-12-12
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Director
$897,528
@ $235.76 · 2024-12-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TMUS
1
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $86.61M
FREIER JON
Chief Operating Officer
$911,810
@ $190.00 · 2026-05-21
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$979,050
@ $195.81 · 2026-05-01
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$727,640
@ $221.10 · 2026-03-04
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$3.30M
@ $220.20 · 2026-02-24
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$517,968
@ $222.40 · 2026-02-24
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$17.20M
@ $214.94 · 2026-02-19
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $214.86 · 2026-02-18
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$3.64M
@ $220.38 · 2026-02-18
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$306,436
@ $210.32 · 2025-12-05
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$9.70M
@ $215.61 · 2025-11-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$539,775
@ $215.91 · 2025-11-17
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$30.82M
@ $239.15 · 2025-09-16
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$11.54M
@ $256.38 · 2025-08-19
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$627,800
@ $251.12 · 2025-08-15
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.96M
@ $240.80 · 2025-07-29
FREIER JON
Officer
$1.75M
@ $250.00 · 2025-07-24
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$49.07M
@ $234.19 · 2025-06-30
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.92M
@ $242.69 · 2025-05-20
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$592,800
@ $237.12 · 2025-05-15
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$191,990
@ $263.00 · 2025-03-05
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$6.58M
@ $263.23 · 2025-02-27
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$12.01M
@ $266.82 · 2025-02-26
EWALDSSON ULF
Officer
$5.16M
@ $265.63 · 2025-02-21
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$7.91M
@ $262.66 · 2025-02-20
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$525,400
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.72M
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$1.05M
@ $269.10 · 2025-02-18
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$2.76M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.49M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$675,000
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
TAYLOR TERESA A
Director
$1.89M
@ $235.65 · 2025-02-03
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$254,188
@ $231.08 · 2024-12-13
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.57M
@ $239.22 · 2024-11-14
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.51M
@ $237.78 · 2024-11-12
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.67M
@ $233.55 · 2024-10-25
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$9.25M
@ $216.26 · 2024-10-16
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$615,900
@ $205.30 · 2024-10-01
CANO NESTOR
Officer
$1.68M
@ $197.21 · 2024-08-19
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$7.79M
@ $194.81 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TMUS
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
TMUS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
View MS Full AnalysisView TMUS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs TMUS

Is Morgan Stanley or T-Mobile US, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMUS trades at a 49.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $339 vs. price $173), compared to MS's 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $269 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while TMUS scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TMUS scores 1.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

TMUS earns 10.4% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or T-Mobile US, Inc.'s?

TMUS's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). TMUS has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.