Compare StocksMS vs TEL

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs TE Connectivity plc (TEL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MS is undervalued at $223, with a DCF intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. TEL is overvalued at $218, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -34%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17
VS
TEL
TE Connectivity plc
$217.64

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TEL
  • TE Connectivity plc has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • TE Connectivity plc scores 81/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TEL
  • FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $6.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
TEL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.20B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.04%
20.21
Trailing P/E
22.23
17.56
Forward P/E
17.21
Quality & Moat
3.38%
ROIC
15.61%
16.39%
ROE
22.72%
87.39%
Gross Margin
36.07%
2.66
PEG Ratio
1.00
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.00
1.81%
Dividend Yield
1.37%
MS: 4Ties: 2TEL: 3
MSTEL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TEL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TEL
$6.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.66B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TEL
33.7% Overvalued
Price is 33.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $217.64
Fair Value: $162.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TEL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $218?

+16.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.6%

The market implies +16.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TEL
81/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TEL
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TEL
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.5%Retail & Other 2.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,805
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TEL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TEL
3
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $120.91M
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-06-01
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-05-06
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.10M
@ $223.26 · 2026-04-08
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.09M
@ $222.52 · 2026-03-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$1.53M
@ $233.64 · 2026-02-13
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.20M
@ $233.82 · 2026-02-13
SHAFFER REUBEN M
Officer
$333,853
@ $234.28 · 2026-02-13
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$1.37M
@ $222.81 · 2026-02-09
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.84M
@ $226.43 · 2025-12-19
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$9.45M
@ $227.07 · 2025-12-19
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$6.20M
@ $247.73 · 2025-11-03
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$20.34M
@ $247.15 · 2025-11-03
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$4.84M
@ $202.99 · 2025-09-02
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$9.60M
@ $209.33 · 2025-07-28
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$403,004
@ $207.20 · 2025-07-28
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$41.15M
@ $208.76 · 2025-07-28
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$10.20M
@ $192.78 · 2025-07-23
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$2.23M
@ $170.00 · 2025-06-26
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.98M
@ $159.03 · 2025-06-02
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$3.32M
@ $162.85 · 2025-05-13
STUCKI AARON KYLE
President
$800,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$500,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$8.49M
@ $159.21 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $153.33 · 2025-05-09
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$4.48M
@ $149.39 · 2025-05-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.67M
@ $146.77 · 2025-03-04
WRIGHT LAURA H
Director
$154,660
@ $154.66 · 2025-02-18
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$587,706
@ $151.16 · 2025-01-27
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$17.79M
@ $154.69 · 2024-11-11
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$6.34M
@ $155.49 · 2024-11-07
OTT ROBERT J
Officer
$2.50M
@ $155.41 · 2024-11-06
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$1.32M
@ $151.41 · 2024-09-03
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$895,048
@ $145.56 · 2024-08-13
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$9.24M
@ $154.70 · 2024-07-31
OTT ROBERT J
Officer
$450,321
@ $154.59 · 2024-07-31
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$33.97M
@ $155.45 · 2024-07-29
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $155.00 · 2024-07-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TEL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
TEL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View MS Full AnalysisView TEL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs TEL

Is Morgan Stanley or TE Connectivity plc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $298 vs. price $223), compared to TEL's -33.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $218).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or TE Connectivity plc?

TEL scores 81/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TEL scores 5.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or TE Connectivity plc?

TEL earns 15.6% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or TE Connectivity plc's?

TEL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). TEL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.