Compare StocksMS vs SPG

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MS is undervalued at $210, with a DCF intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. SPG is undervalued at $229, with an intrinsic value of $65577965220 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, SPG has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42
VS
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
$229.37

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
SPG
  • Gross margin of 81.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Simon Property Group, Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
SPG
  • PEG ratio of 4.58 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (4.49x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
SPG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.49B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
17.01
Trailing P/E
15.95
15.45
Forward P/E
34.03
Quality & Moat
3.68%
ROIC
6.45%
14.08%
ROE
113.59%
87.64%
Gross Margin
81.58%
1.99
PEG Ratio
4.58
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
4.49
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.79
2.19%
Dividend Yield
3.84%
MS: 4Ties: 1SPG: 4
MSSPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SPG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SPG
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$205.6M
Δ Market Cap
+$67.63
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SPG
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $229.37
Fair Value: $65577965220.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

SPG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

-10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.0%

The market implies -10.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SPG
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SPG
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SPG
Insiders 1.8%Institutions 94.8%Retail & Other 3.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,844
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SPG
10
Buys (3M)
26
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $792,795
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$9,871
@ $224.34 · 2026-06-30
STEWART MARTA R.
Director
$672.00
@ $224.00 · 2026-06-30
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$7,392
@ $224.00 · 2026-06-30
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$2,010
@ $223.33 · 2026-06-30
JONES NINA P.
Director
$447.00
@ $223.50 · 2026-06-30
CICCO MARTIN J
Director
$447.00
@ $223.50 · 2026-06-30
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$13,004
@ $224.21 · 2026-06-30
GLASSCOCK LARRY C
Director
$15,046
@ $224.57 · 2026-06-30
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$10,538
@ $224.21 · 2026-06-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$17,525
@ $224.68 · 2026-06-30
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$40,620
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
STEWART MARTA R.
Director
$36,025
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$37,863
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$14,888
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
JONES NINA P.
Director
$6,617
@ $183.81 · 2026-03-31
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$10,293
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$65,249
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
GLASSCOCK LARRY C
Director
$68,557
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$42,642
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$90,246
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$100,258
@ $183.96 · 2025-12-15
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$106,310
@ $180.80 · 2025-11-18
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$38,678
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$36,260
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$14,132
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
STEWART MARTA R.
Director
$7,205
@ $171.55 · 2025-08-14
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$37,274
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
STEWART MARTA R.
Director
$33,132
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$13,699
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
JONES NINA P.
Director
$6,053
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$60,212
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$39,185
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$83,149
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$79,434
@ $164.80 · 2025-03-31
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$30,449
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
JONES NINA P.
Director
$3,346
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$54,372
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$32,791
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
GLASSCOCK LARRY C
Director
$56,547
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
HUBBARD ALLAN B
Director
$61,901
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$75,787
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SPG
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.01M
RULLI JOHN
Officer
$2.01M
@ $200.88 · 2026-02-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SPG
FearGreed
😏Greed(71/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
SPG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
View MS Full AnalysisView SPG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs SPG

Is Morgan Stanley or Simon Property Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SPG trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $65577965220 vs. price $229), compared to MS's 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $269 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Simon Property Group, Inc.?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while SPG scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Simon Property Group, Inc. in financial distress?

SPG's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MS scores 0.3 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Simon Property Group, Inc.?

SPG earns 6.4% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or Simon Property Group, Inc.'s?

MS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to SPG's 54/100 (Borderline). MS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MS vs SPG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io