Compare StocksMS vs ROP

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MS is undervalued at $210, with a DCF intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. ROP is fairly valued at $392, with an intrinsic value of $439 and a margin of safety of 11%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42
VS
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$391.97

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ROP
  • Gross margin of 69.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.3x is 45% below the historical average of 29.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
ROP
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $3.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
ROP
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.27B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.84%
17.01
Trailing P/E
16.34
15.45
Forward P/E
16.16
Quality & Moat
3.68%
ROIC
6.04%
14.08%
ROE
13.07%
87.64%
Gross Margin
69.53%
1.99
PEG Ratio
1.71
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.59
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.38
2.19%
Dividend Yield
0.93%
MS: 4Ties: 3ROP: 2
MSROP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROP
$0.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROP
10.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $391.97
Fair Value: $439.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ROP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $392?

+8.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%

The market implies +8.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROP
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROP
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROP
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 106.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,566
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROP
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.57M
JOYCE THOMAS PATRICK JR
Director
$501,844
@ $358.46 · 2026-02-06
BRINKLEY AMY WOODS
Director
$540,856
@ $450.71 · 2025-11-12
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$4.52M
@ $452.23 · 2025-11-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROP
2
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $19.27M
STIPANCICH JOHN K
Officer
$758,100
@ $379.05 · 2026-07-27
WALLMAN RICHARD F.
Director
$2.32M
@ $361.00 · 2026-07-24
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.67M
@ $445.56 · 2025-12-01
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$13.31M
@ $443.57 · 2025-11-11
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$210,158
@ $525.39 · 2025-08-15
STIPANCICH JOHN K
General Counsel
$846,255
@ $564.17 · 2025-07-23
WALLMAN RICHARD F.
Director
$195,800
@ $556.25 · 2025-07-22
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
Director
$200,277
@ $572.22 · 2025-05-05
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.76M
@ $588.19 · 2025-02-25
CROSS BRANDON L
Officer
$433,372
@ $577.83 · 2025-02-04
STIPANCICH JOHN K
General Counsel
$578,040
@ $578.04 · 2025-01-31
CONLEY JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.73M
@ $578.05 · 2025-01-31
WALLMAN RICHARD F.
Director
$201,913
@ $575.25 · 2025-01-31
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$528,092
@ $561.80 · 2024-12-03
HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
Chief Executive Officer
$17.17M
@ $572.47 · 2024-11-08
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
Director
$387,366
@ $568.82 · 2024-11-08
JOHNSON ROBERT D.
Director
$415,335
@ $553.78 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
ROP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View MS Full AnalysisView ROP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs ROP

Is Morgan Stanley or Roper Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $269 vs. price $210), compared to ROP's 10.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $439 vs. $392).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while ROP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROP scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

ROP earns 6.0% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or Roper Technologies, Inc.'s?

ROP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). ROP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.