Compare StocksMS vs RMD

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs ResMed Inc. (RMD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MS is undervalued at $223, with a DCF intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. RMD is undervalued at $189, with an intrinsic value of $253 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, RMD has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17
VS
RMD
ResMed Inc.
$188.63

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
RMD
  • ResMed Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 62.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ResMed Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RMD
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $3.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
RMD
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.45B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.29%
20.21
Trailing P/E
18.17
17.56
Forward P/E
15.56
Quality & Moat
3.38%
ROIC
21.07%
16.39%
ROE
25.25%
87.39%
Gross Margin
62.18%
2.66
PEG Ratio
1.14
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.39
1.81%
Dividend Yield
1.25%
MS: 3Ties: 1RMD: 5
MSRMD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RMD
$1.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RMD
25.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $188.63
Fair Value: $252.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

RMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $189?

+5.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.5%

The market implies +5.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RMD
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RMD
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RMD
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 70.0%Retail & Other 29.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,432
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RMD
5
Sells (3M)
38
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $29.18M
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$968,064
@ $193.96 · 2026-06-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $207.82 · 2026-05-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.13M
@ $225.50 · 2026-04-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$224,310
@ $224.31 · 2026-04-01
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$450,000
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.03 · 2026-03-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$520,440
@ $260.22 · 2026-03-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$254,300
@ $254.30 · 2026-03-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.37M
@ $273.78 · 2026-02-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,620
@ $251.31 · 2026-02-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$13,000
@ $260.00 · 2026-02-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$257,030
@ $257.03 · 2026-02-02
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,660
@ $248.83 · 2026-01-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.24M
@ $248.46 · 2026-01-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$241,750
@ $241.75 · 2026-01-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,088
@ $241.76 · 2026-01-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.41 · 2025-12-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,940
@ $251.47 · 2025-12-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,160
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,208
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$524,025
@ $255.00 · 2025-11-25
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$504,100
@ $252.05 · 2025-11-12
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$121,872
@ $250.25 · 2025-11-11
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $249.75 · 2025-11-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$742,620
@ $247.54 · 2025-11-03
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $282.85 · 2025-10-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$823,080
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$27,436
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $278.14 · 2025-09-08
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$812,310
@ $270.77 · 2025-09-02
HERNANDEZ JOHN
Director
$739,289
@ $287.10 · 2025-08-18
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $279.48 · 2025-08-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$845,700
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,095
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $256.72 · 2025-07-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$241,438
@ $255.49 · 2025-07-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$997,892
@ $256.99 · 2025-07-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$16,961
@ $256.98 · 2025-07-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $251.21 · 2025-06-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$494,640
@ $247.32 · 2025-06-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$243,780
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$9,995
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$891,286
@ $244.59 · 2025-05-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$486,940
@ $243.47 · 2025-05-20
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,500
@ $242.25 · 2025-05-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $243.23 · 2025-05-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$215,580
@ $215.58 · 2025-04-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.68M
@ $209.85 · 2025-04-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$439,480
@ $219.74 · 2025-04-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$14,263
@ $222.86 · 2025-04-01
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$230,360
@ $230.36 · 2025-03-10
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.33M
@ $239.31 · 2025-03-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.84M
@ $229.20 · 2025-03-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$455,420
@ $227.71 · 2025-03-05
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.15M
@ $235.40 · 2025-03-03
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,982
@ $234.09 · 2025-03-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$238,980
@ $238.98 · 2025-02-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.90M
@ $236.77 · 2025-02-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,220
@ $242.11 · 2025-02-05
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$15,515
@ $242.42 · 2025-02-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$234,040
@ $234.04 · 2025-01-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$461,980
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$17,324
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,230
@ $244.23 · 2024-12-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$491,300
@ $245.65 · 2024-12-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$18,419
@ $248.91 · 2024-12-02
LEONG JUSTIN
Officer
$1.50M
@ $243.09 · 2024-11-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$198,053
@ $248.81 · 2024-11-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$249,000
@ $249.00 · 2024-11-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.62M
@ $246.26 · 2024-11-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,480
@ $248.74 · 2024-11-06
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$16,698
@ $242.00 · 2024-11-01
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.02M
@ $238.48 · 2024-10-11
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$233,470
@ $233.47 · 2024-10-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.41M
@ $231.91 · 2024-10-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$474,400
@ $237.20 · 2024-10-02
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.26M
@ $252.56 · 2024-09-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$246,420
@ $246.42 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $248.38 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$479,800
@ $239.90 · 2024-09-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$203,742
@ $231.00 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RMD
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
RMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View MS Full AnalysisView RMD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs RMD

Is Morgan Stanley or ResMed Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RMD trades at a 25.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $253 vs. price $189), compared to MS's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $298 vs. $223).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or ResMed Inc.?

RMD scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RMD scores 12.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or ResMed Inc.?

RMD earns 21.1% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or ResMed Inc.'s?

RMD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). RMD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.