Compare StocksMS vs Q

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

MS
Morgan Stanley
$158.55
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$111.94

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.65 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.75 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Q

    Risks

    MS
    • High leverage (4.56x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 7 insider sales totaling $25.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MS
      Q
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $776.50M
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.31%
      15.53
      Trailing P/E
      33.92
      12.89
      Forward P/E
      25.33
      Quality & Moat
      3.43%
      ROIC
      6.45%
      14.42%
      ROE
      9.39%
      87.06%
      Gross Margin
      46.17%
      0.75
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      4.56
      Debt / Equity
      0.61
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.58
      2.52%
      Dividend Yield
      0.13%
      MS: 5Ties: 1Q: 2
      MSQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MS

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MS
      $6.65
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $20.84B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$138.59B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MS
      45.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 45.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $158.55
      Fair Value: $290.92
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      17.4% Overvalued
      Price is 17.4% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $111.94
      Fair Value: $95.35
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MS

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

      +16.9%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.3%

      The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MS
      32/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MS
      -2.09
      Possible Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MS
      Insiders 24.0%Institutions 62.7%Retail & Other 13.3%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,182
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,228
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MS
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $5,630
      PETERSON DOUGLAS L
      Director
      $5,630
      @ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      0
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $329,572
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MS
      7
      Sells (3M)
      16
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $62.45M
      SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
      President
      $6.02M
      @ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
      GROSSMAN ERIC F
      Officer
      $3.97M
      @ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
      CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
      Officer
      $1.44M
      @ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
      YESHAYA SHARON
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.94M
      @ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
      SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
      Officer
      $1.55M
      @ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
      PIZZI MICHAEL A
      Officer
      $3.69M
      @ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
      SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
      President
      $5.57M
      @ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
      PICK EDWARD N.
      Chief Executive Officer
      $16.43M
      @ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
      GROSSMAN ERIC F
      Officer
      $1.69M
      @ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
      SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
      President
      $4.09M
      @ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
      SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
      Officer
      $2.81M
      @ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
      PIZZI MICHAEL A
      Officer
      $2.53M
      @ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
      SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
      President
      $3.70M
      @ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
      HERZ ROBERT H
      Director
      $95,459
      @ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
      SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
      President
      $4.80M
      @ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
      GROSSMAN ERIC F
      Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
      CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
      Officer
      $1.15M
      @ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
      GROSSMAN ERIC F
      Officer
      $1.78M
      @ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
      SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
      President
      $5.00M
      @ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
      AKRAM RAJA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.38M
      @ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
      PIZZI MICHAEL A
      Officer
      $2.52M
      @ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
      SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
      President
      $4.20M
      @ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
      CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
      Officer
      $368,375
      @ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
      AKRAM RAJA
      Officer
      $797,764
      @ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
      SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
      President
      $4.26M
      @ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
      HERZ ROBERT H
      Director
      $106,621
      @ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
      CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
      Officer
      $692,663
      @ $99.61 · 2024-05-14
      GORMAN JAMES P
      Officer and Director
      $9.02M
      @ $90.21 · 2024-04-18
      SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
      Officer
      $1.01M
      @ $90.09 · 2024-04-17
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $828,193
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MS
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(48/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MS
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      View MS Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis