Compare StocksMS vs POOL

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Pool Corporation (POOL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MS is undervalued at $223, with a DCF intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. POOL is fairly valued at $199, with an intrinsic value of $211 and a margin of safety of 6%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17
VS
POOL
Pool Corporation
$198.99

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
POOL
  • Pool Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Pool Corporation scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
POOL
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
POOL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$309.52M
N/A
FCF Yield
4.27%
20.21
Trailing P/E
18.31
17.56
Forward P/E
16.53
Quality & Moat
3.38%
ROIC
11.27%
16.39%
ROE
34.24%
87.39%
Gross Margin
29.69%
2.66
PEG Ratio
1.60
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.34
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.38
1.81%
Dividend Yield
2.63%
MS: 2Ties: 1POOL: 6
MSPOOL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

POOL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
POOL
$-4.14
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$831.9M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.44B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
POOL
5.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 5.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $198.99
Fair Value: $211.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

POOL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $199?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.4%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
POOL
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
POOL
-2.15
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
POOL
Insiders 3.5%Institutions 105.9%
No. of Institutional Holders865
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
POOL
8
Buys (3M)
14
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.70M
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$557.00
@ $185.67 · 2026-05-28
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.76M
@ $175.95 · 2026-05-13
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$99,981
@ $190.44 · 2026-05-08
STOKELY JOHN E
Director
$193,065
@ $193.06 · 2026-05-07
HOPE JAMES D
Director
$90,209
@ $194.42 · 2026-05-07
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.90M
@ $190.00 · 2026-05-07
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$9,127
@ $202.82 · 2026-03-26
HART MELANIE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$1,620
@ $202.50 · 2026-03-25
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.02M
@ $205.00 · 2026-03-13
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.09M
@ $218.00 · 2026-03-02
HOPE JAMES D
Director
$300,162
@ $213.64 · 2026-02-25
ST ROMAIN KENNETH G
Officer
$1.22M
@ $218.67 · 2026-02-23
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,996
@ $243.14 · 2025-11-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,932
@ $319.00 · 2025-08-28
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$9,005
@ $300.17 · 2025-05-29
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,164
@ $326.56 · 2025-03-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$7,966
@ $379.33 · 2024-11-27
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,119
@ $353.00 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
POOL
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.94M
NEIL JENNIFER M
Officer
$103,429
@ $203.60 · 2026-03-24
HART MELANIE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$605,000
@ $220.00 · 2026-02-24
ARVAN PETER D.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.23M
@ $245.57 · 2025-12-02
NEIL JENNIFER M
Officer
$385,245
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-31
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$9.58M
@ $348.41 · 2025-02-25
HOUSEY HART MELANIE MONROE
Chief Financial Officer
$799,006
@ $345.59 · 2025-02-24
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$3.46M
@ $346.00 · 2025-02-24
NEIL JENNIFER M
General Counsel
$256,251
@ $373.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
POOL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
POOL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View MS Full AnalysisView POOL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs POOL

Is Morgan Stanley or Pool Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $298 vs. price $223), compared to POOL's 5.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $211 vs. $199).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Pool Corporation?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while POOL scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. POOL scores 4.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Pool Corporation?

POOL earns 11.3% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or Pool Corporation's?

POOL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). POOL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MS vs POOL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io