Compare StocksMS vs PODD

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Insulet Corporation (PODD)

MS
Morgan Stanley
$158.55
VS
PODD
Insulet Corporation
$228.63

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.65 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.75 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PODD
  • Gross margin of 71.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 65.7x is 95% below the historical average of 1346.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 9.10 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

MS
  • High leverage (4.56x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $25.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PODD
  • FCF yield of 2.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 16.85 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
PODD
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$349.90M
N/A
FCF Yield
2.17%
15.53
Trailing P/E
65.70
12.89
Forward P/E
28.27
Quality & Moat
3.43%
ROIC
15.86%
14.42%
ROE
16.31%
87.06%
Gross Margin
71.63%
0.75
PEG Ratio
16.85
Balance Sheet Safety
4.56
Debt / Equity
0.66
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
2.52%
Dividend Yield
N/A
MS: 4Ties: 1PODD: 3
MSPODD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PODD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PODD
$-0.52
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$871.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-455.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
45.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 45.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $158.55
Fair Value: $290.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PODD
0.5% Overvalued
Price is 0.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $228.63
Fair Value: $227.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PODD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

+24.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.3%

The market implies +24.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PODD
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PODD
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.0%Institutions 62.7%Retail & Other 13.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,182
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PODD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 103.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,220
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PODD
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $799,731
MINOGUE MICHAEL R
Director
$499,847
@ $246.23 · 2026-02-25
STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
Director
$299,884
@ $311.73 · 2025-12-05
CHADWICK ANA MARIA
Chief Financial Officer
$20,600
@ $206.00 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
7
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.45M
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$692,663
@ $99.61 · 2024-05-14
GORMAN JAMES P
Officer and Director
$9.02M
@ $90.21 · 2024-04-18
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.01M
@ $90.09 · 2024-04-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PODD
0
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.95M
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$542,510
@ $293.09 · 2025-12-15
SINGH PREM
Officer
$238,726
@ $347.49 · 2025-09-08
COUSIN LAETITIA
Officer
$278,002
@ $348.81 · 2025-09-08
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.42M
@ $332.23 · 2025-08-21
SINGH PREM
Officer
$429,760
@ $320.00 · 2025-08-07
MANEA DANIEL
Officer
$390,065
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
SINGH PREM
Officer
$698,216
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$147,056
@ $305.73 · 2025-06-09
KAPPLES JOHN W.
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $318.47 · 2025-05-14
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$960,320
@ $320.00 · 2025-05-13
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.66M
@ $317.54 · 2025-05-13
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$501,875
@ $275.00 · 2025-03-25
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$3.47M
@ $280.00 · 2025-01-21
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.17M
@ $267.60 · 2024-12-16
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$252,192
@ $275.62 · 2024-12-10
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$139,598
@ $274.80 · 2024-11-12
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.72M
@ $225.26 · 2024-09-11
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$1.13M
@ $225.84 · 2024-09-10
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$333,443
@ $221.41 · 2024-09-09
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$305,463
@ $220.87 · 2024-09-09
SINGH PREM
Officer
$368,940
@ $202.27 · 2024-08-30
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$281,561
@ $203.00 · 2024-08-28
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$299,940
@ $199.96 · 2024-06-14
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$405,806
@ $190.43 · 2024-06-10
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$1.33M
@ $190.51 · 2024-06-10
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$65,729
@ $182.58 · 2024-06-04
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$596,970
@ $180.90 · 2024-05-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PODD
FearGreed
😨Fear(28/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
PODD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (28)
View MS Full AnalysisView PODD Full Analysis