Compare StocksMS vs NEM

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Newmont Corporation (NEM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MS is undervalued at $223, with a DCF intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. NEM is overvalued at $104, with an intrinsic value of $39 and a margin of safety of -169%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17
VS
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$103.79

Rewards

MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
NEM
  • Gross margin of 67.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 88.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.40 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
NEM
  • Share count has increased by 37% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • PEG ratio of 2.78 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MS
NEM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$9.80B
N/A
FCF Yield
8.85%
20.21
Trailing P/E
13.46
17.56
Forward P/E
9.11
Quality & Moat
3.38%
ROIC
29.80%
16.39%
ROE
25.83%
87.39%
Gross Margin
67.36%
2.66
PEG Ratio
2.78
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
1.81%
Dividend Yield
0.96%
MS: 3Ties: 2NEM: 4
MSNEM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NEM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NEM
$16.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$71.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NEM
39.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 39.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.79
Fair Value: $172.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NEM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $104?

+4.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.6%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NEM
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NEM
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NEM
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 81.4%Retail & Other 18.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,575
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NEM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CONGER HARRY M IV
Director
$400,335
@ $42.15 · 2024-11-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NEM
5
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.04M
TOTH PETER
Officer
$315,960
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Executive Officer
$408,852
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$330,330
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
WEXLER PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.47M
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$339,270
@ $113.09 · 2026-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$324,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-03-18
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$164,382
@ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$268,968
@ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$577,590
@ $130.00 · 2026-02-27
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$643,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-25
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$192,109
@ $92.36 · 2025-12-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$406,700
@ $81.34 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$168,397
@ $80.96 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$176,779
@ $84.99 · 2025-10-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$154,923
@ $74.59 · 2025-09-02
TABOLT BRIAN
Officer
$477,160
@ $68.02 · 2025-08-06
TOTH PETER
Officer
$190,980
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$132,222
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$176,250
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$122,024
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$162,270
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$112,345
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$154,440
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$106,924
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$145,380
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$100,651
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$131,130
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$340,894
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$90,786
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$128,670
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$386,010
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$89,083
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$120,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$83,080
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$540,670
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$374,310
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$124,770
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$590,850
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$136,350
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$161,430
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$157,410
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
CAGE JOSHUA
Officer
$49,150
@ $49.15 · 2024-08-14
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$990,250
@ $49.51 · 2024-08-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$547,690
@ $42.13 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NEM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
NEM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View MS Full AnalysisView NEM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MS vs NEM

Is Morgan Stanley or Newmont Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $298 vs. price $223), compared to NEM's -169.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $39 vs. $104).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Morgan Stanley or Newmont Corporation?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while NEM scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NEM scores 4.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Morgan Stanley or Newmont Corporation?

NEM earns 29.8% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Morgan Stanley's or Newmont Corporation's?

NEM's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). NEM has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

MS vs NEM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io