Compare StocksMRK vs UNP

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MRK is undervalued at $145, with a DCF intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 76%. UNP is overvalued at $281, with an intrinsic value of $220 and a margin of safety of -28%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$144.91
VS
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$280.92

Rewards

MRK
  • Gross margin of 75.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
UNP
  • Union Pacific Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Union Pacific Corporation scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

MRK
  • PEG ratio of 2.65 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
UNP
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.15 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 2.83 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MRK
UNP
Valuation
$15.17B
Free Cash Flow
$4.72B
4.24%
FCF Yield
2.83%
115.93
Trailing P/E
22.99
15.17
Forward P/E
19.85
Quality & Moat
-0.13%
ROIC
15.87%
6.96%
ROE
39.70%
75.90%
Gross Margin
56.28%
2.65
PEG Ratio
2.83
Balance Sheet Safety
1.11
Net Debt / Equity
1.41
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.62
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.26
2.35%
Dividend Yield
2.02%
MRK: 8Ties: 1UNP: 3
MRKUNP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MRK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MRK
$-1.72
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$12.28B
Δ Market Cap
$-21.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNP
$0.98
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$10.64B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MRK
75.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 75.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $144.91
Fair Value: $596.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNP
27.6% Overvalued
Price is 27.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $280.92
Fair Value: $220.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MRK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $145?

+7.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.6%

The market implies +7.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $281?

+12.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.6%

The market implies +12.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MRK
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNP
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MRK
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNP
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MRK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.1%Retail & Other 16.9%
No. of Institutional Holders4,839
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNP
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.3%Retail & Other 8.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,643
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MRK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
THULIN INGE G
Director
$250,000
@ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
Director
$1.33M
@ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MRK
7
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $72.01M
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.35M
@ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$5.94M
@ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$10.72M
@ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.97M
@ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$788,773
@ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$6.81M
@ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
MARALDO DAVID R.
Officer
$2.41M
@ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.20M
@ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.18M
@ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$14.49M
@ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$4.56M
@ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$609,525
@ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$1.83M
@ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$2.44M
@ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$765,920
@ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.79M
@ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
Chief Financial Officer
$5.02M
@ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
DAVIS ROBERT M
Chief Executive Officer
$5.60M
@ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$616,395
@ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$720,040
@ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$352,723
@ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$714,745
@ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$512,057
@ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$209,551
@ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNP
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.25M
GEHRINGER ERIC J.
Officer
$789,504
@ $263.96 · 2026-06-03
ROCKER KENYATTA G.
Officer
$7.44M
@ $271.76 · 2026-04-24
HAMANN JENNIFER L
Chief Financial Officer
$549,400
@ $274.70 · 2026-04-24
GEHRINGER ERIC J.
Officer
$469,625
@ $234.93 · 2026-03-20
RICHARDSON CRAIG V
Officer
$1.64M
@ $252.00 · 2025-01-27
WHITED ELIZABETH F.
President
$1.88M
@ $250.00 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MRK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MRK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
UNP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View MRK Full AnalysisView UNP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MRK vs UNP

Is Merck & Co., Inc. or Union Pacific Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 75.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $145), compared to UNP's -27.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $220 vs. $281).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Merck & Co., Inc. or Union Pacific Corporation?

UNP scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Merck & Co., Inc. or Union Pacific Corporation?

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) generates a 4.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Union Pacific Corporation's 2.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Merck & Co., Inc. or Union Pacific Corporation?

UNP earns 15.9% ROIC versus MRK's -0.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Merck & Co., Inc.'s or Union Pacific Corporation's?

UNP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MRK's 79/100 (Safe). UNP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MRK vs UNP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io