Compare StocksMRK vs RTX

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) vs RTX Corporation (RTX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MRK is undervalued at $147, with a DCF intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 75%. RTX is overvalued at $194, with an intrinsic value of $110 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$147.15
VS
RTX
RTX Corporation
$193.54

Rewards

MRK
  • Gross margin of 75.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
RTX
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.48 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MRK
  • PEG ratio of 2.65 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
RTX
  • Gross margin of 20.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • PEG ratio of 2.28 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $6.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MRK
RTX
Valuation
$15.17B
Free Cash Flow
$9.88B
4.18%
FCF Yield
3.79%
117.72
Trailing P/E
34.01
15.41
Forward P/E
24.65
Quality & Moat
-0.13%
ROIC
8.76%
6.96%
ROE
12.27%
75.90%
Gross Margin
20.35%
2.65
PEG Ratio
2.28
Balance Sheet Safety
1.11
Net Debt / Equity
0.45
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.62
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.92
2.35%
Dividend Yield
1.48%
MRK: 6Ties: 1RTX: 5
MRKRTX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MRK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RTX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MRK
$-1.72
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$12.28B
Δ Market Cap
$-21.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RTX
$21.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$98.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MRK
75.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 75.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.15
Fair Value: $596.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RTX
76.4% Overvalued
Price is 76.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $193.54
Fair Value: $109.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MRK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $147?

+8.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.8%

The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

RTX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $194?

+15.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.0%

The market implies +15.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MRK
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RTX
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MRK
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RTX
-2.30
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MRK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.1%Retail & Other 16.9%
No. of Institutional Holders4,839
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RTX
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 81.7%Retail & Other 18.2%
No. of Institutional Holders4,109
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MRK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
THULIN INGE G
Director
$250,000
@ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
Director
$1.33M
@ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RTX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WINNEFELD JAMES A. JR.
Director
$23,580
@ $117.90 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MRK
7
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $72.01M
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.35M
@ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$10.72M
@ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$5.94M
@ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.97M
@ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$788,773
@ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
MARALDO DAVID R.
Officer
$2.41M
@ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$6.81M
@ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.20M
@ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.18M
@ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$14.49M
@ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$1.83M
@ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$609,525
@ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$4.56M
@ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$2.44M
@ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$765,920
@ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.79M
@ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
Chief Financial Officer
$5.02M
@ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
DAVIS ROBERT M
Chief Executive Officer
$5.60M
@ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$616,395
@ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$720,040
@ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$352,723
@ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$714,745
@ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$512,057
@ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$209,551
@ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RTX
4
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $41.78M
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$3.06M
@ $223.92 · 2026-08-18
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.50M
@ $214.68 · 2026-07-28
ATKINSON TRACY A
Director
$500,424
@ $218.05 · 2026-07-27
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$1.80M
@ $210.29 · 2026-07-24
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.58M
@ $202.83 · 2026-02-23
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$7.35M
@ $205.56 · 2026-02-19
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$3.10M
@ $204.65 · 2026-02-19
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.96M
@ $203.80 · 2026-02-19
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.64M
@ $201.30 · 2026-02-13
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$3.49M
@ $199.16 · 2026-02-12
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$1.58M
@ $195.03 · 2026-02-10
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$858,278
@ $178.32 · 2025-10-27
ATKINSON TRACY A
Director
$500,948
@ $178.91 · 2025-10-24
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$873,528
@ $180.15 · 2025-10-24
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$4.15M
@ $159.79 · 2025-08-27
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$1.19M
@ $155.20 · 2025-08-12
JASPER PHILIP J
Officer
$2.03M
@ $157.82 · 2025-08-04
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.36M
@ $156.20 · 2025-07-24
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$222,600
@ $152.26 · 2025-07-23
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.33M
@ $137.62 · 2025-06-03
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$528,777
@ $127.54 · 2025-05-06
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $130.35 · 2025-02-27
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $130.36 · 2025-02-27
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$2.46M
@ $126.82 · 2025-02-25
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$361,736
@ $125.95 · 2025-02-24
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.30M
@ $125.08 · 2025-02-19
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$1.95M
@ $124.45 · 2025-02-18
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$1.81M
@ $129.23 · 2025-02-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MRK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RTX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MRK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
RTX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View MRK Full AnalysisView RTX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MRK vs RTX

Is Merck & Co., Inc. or RTX Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 75.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $147), compared to RTX's -76.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $110 vs. $194).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Merck & Co., Inc. or RTX Corporation?

MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while RTX scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is RTX Corporation in financial distress?

RTX's Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MRK scores 3.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Merck & Co., Inc. or RTX Corporation?

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) generates a 4.2% free cash flow yield, compared to RTX Corporation's 3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Merck & Co., Inc. or RTX Corporation?

RTX earns 8.8% ROIC versus MRK's -0.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Merck & Co., Inc.'s or RTX Corporation's?

MRK's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to RTX's 78/100 (Safe). MRK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.