Compare StocksMPC vs PFE

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MPC is overvalued at $422, with a DCF intrinsic value of $324 and a margin of safety of -30%. PFE is overvalued at $28, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
$422.27
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.68

Rewards

MPC
  • Share count has been reduced by 35% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

MPC
  • ROIC has declined by 17.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 12.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.56 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MPC
PFE
Valuation
$9.25B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
7.80%
FCF Yield
7.92%
14.64
Trailing P/E
36.41
9.90
Forward P/E
9.55
Quality & Moat
27.52%
ROIC
9.42%
42.10%
ROE
5.01%
12.82%
Gross Margin
74.72%
2.01
PEG Ratio
12.56
Balance Sheet Safety
1.03
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.72
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
0.97%
Dividend Yield
6.26%
MPC: 5Ties: 3PFE: 4
MPCPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MPC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MPC
$-0.36
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$13.62B
Δ Market Cap
$-4.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MPC
234.7% Overvalued
Price is 234.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $422.27
Fair Value: $126.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
23.4% Overvalued
Price is 23.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.68
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MPC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $422?

+15.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.4%

The market implies +15.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MPC
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MPC
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MPC
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 79.5%Retail & Other 20.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,438
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MPC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESSLING RICKY D.
Officer
$269,440
@ $134.72 · 2025-03-11
BAYH B EVAN III
Director
$133,700
@ $133.70 · 2025-03-05
CAMPBELL JEFFREY C
Director
$897,644
@ $149.61 · 2024-12-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MPC
5
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.87M
LYON SHAWN M.
Officer
$532,367
@ $373.59 · 2026-08-31
BRZEZINSKI ERIN M
Officer
$206,790
@ $362.79 · 2026-08-27
BENSON MOLLY R.
Officer
$6.17M
@ $358.57 · 2026-08-17
LYON SHAWN M.
Officer
$875,000
@ $350.00 · 2026-08-13
HENSCHEN MICHAEL A II
Officer
$2.05M
@ $341.56 · 2026-08-12
HENSCHEN MICHAEL A II
Officer
$1.70M
@ $268.82 · 2026-06-04
HESSLING RICKY D.
Officer
$250,000
@ $250.00 · 2026-05-13
HESSLING RICKY D.
Officer
$371,021
@ $228.18 · 2026-03-13
HESSLING RICKY D.
Officer
$644,401
@ $226.34 · 2026-03-12
HENSCHEN MICHAEL A II
Officer
$1.07M
@ $202.32 · 2026-02-12
BENSON MOLLY R.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $163.00 · 2025-08-15
RUCKER KIM K. W.
Director
$1.29M
@ $175.00 · 2025-07-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MPC
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MPC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View MPC Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MPC vs PFE

Is Marathon Petroleum Corporation or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -23.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $28), compared to MPC's -30.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $324 vs. $422).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Marathon Petroleum Corporation or Pfizer Inc.?

MPC scores 54/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MPC scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Marathon Petroleum Corporation or Pfizer Inc.?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation's 7.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Marathon Petroleum Corporation or Pfizer Inc.?

MPC earns 27.5% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Marathon Petroleum Corporation's or Pfizer Inc.'s?

MPC's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). MPC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.