Compare StocksMETA vs USB

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, META is fairly valued at $673, with a DCF intrinsic value of $647 and a margin of safety of -4%. USB is undervalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $104 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, USB has the wider margin of safety.

META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$673.31
VS
USB
U.S. Bancorp
$59.73

Rewards

META
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 81.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
USB
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.15 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

META
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $7.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
USB
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
META
USB
Valuation
$46.11B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
2.69%
FCF Yield
N/A
25.38
Trailing P/E
11.92
19.26
Forward P/E
10.32
Quality & Moat
16.81%
ROIC
8.58%
29.85%
ROE
12.62%
81.75%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.88
PEG Ratio
1.89
Balance Sheet Safety
0.08
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.31%
Dividend Yield
3.62%
META: 4Ties: 1USB: 3
METAUSB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

USB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
USB
$1.80
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$9.04B
Δ Market Cap
+$16.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
META
4.0% Overvalued
Price is 4.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $673.31
Fair Value: $647.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
USB
42.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 42.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $59.73
Fair Value: $103.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $673?

+12.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.3%

The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

USB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
USB
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
USB
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 20.8%
No. of Institutional Holders6,609
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
USB
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,626
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
USB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GILLANI ALEEM
Director
$186,600
@ $37.32 · 2025-04-21
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
META
5
Sells (3M)
47
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $43.41M
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$2.00M
@ $618.06 · 2026-09-03
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.38M
@ $558.00 · 2026-08-18
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$847,581
@ $543.67 · 2026-08-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$280,780
@ $561.56 · 2026-08-03
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$303,875
@ $607.75 · 2026-07-01
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$326,227
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,932
@ $628.00 · 2025-11-04
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$339,152
@ $656.00 · 2025-11-03
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$390,807
@ $753.00 · 2025-10-28
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,528
@ $749.57 · 2025-10-27
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$382,176
@ $736.37 · 2025-10-21
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$372,912
@ $721.30 · 2025-10-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$333,391
@ $716.97 · 2025-10-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
USB
3
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.41M
KEDIA GUNJAN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.70M
@ $62.37 · 2026-08-28
CHOSY JAMES L
General Counsel
$1.45M
@ $63.28 · 2026-07-23
PHILIPSON STEPHEN L.
Officer
$2.33M
@ $63.08 · 2026-07-20
DILIP VENKATACHARI
Chief Technology Officer
$1.92M
@ $55.52 · 2026-05-05
RICHARD JODI L
Officer
$2.28M
@ $57.00 · 2026-04-21
RUNKEL MARK G
Officer
$1.95M
@ $60.65 · 2026-02-06
BARCELOS ELCIO R.T.
Officer
$1.01M
@ $58.43 · 2026-02-03
CHOSY JAMES L
General Counsel
$1.26M
@ $46.86 · 2025-10-20
CECERE ANDREW J
Director
$6.51M
@ $46.35 · 2025-10-20
STARK LISA R
Officer
$923,400
@ $46.40 · 2025-07-21
BADRAN SOUHEIL
Chief Operating Officer
$1.10M
@ $46.34 · 2025-07-21
ROY ARIJIT
Officer
$97,701
@ $43.68 · 2025-03-07
RICHARD JODI L
Officer
$1.43M
@ $47.59 · 2025-02-06
CHOSY JAMES L
General Counsel
$1.02M
@ $47.65 · 2025-02-05
CECERE ANDREW J
Chief Executive Officer
$4.82M
@ $47.25 · 2025-02-04
DOLAN TERRANCE ROBERT
Officer
$3.11M
@ $46.96 · 2025-02-03
STARK LISA R
Officer
$151,144
@ $47.10 · 2025-02-03
RICHARD JODI L
Officer
$1.23M
@ $49.03 · 2024-10-18
KOTWAL SHAILESH M
Officer
$1.74M
@ $49.74 · 2024-10-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
META
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
USB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
META
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
USB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View META Full AnalysisView USB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: META vs USB

Is Meta Platforms, Inc. or U.S. Bancorp more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, USB trades at a 42.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $104 vs. price $60), compared to META's -4.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $647 vs. $673).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Meta Platforms, Inc. or U.S. Bancorp?

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while USB scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is U.S. Bancorp in financial distress?

USB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. META scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Meta Platforms, Inc. or U.S. Bancorp?

META earns 16.8% ROIC versus USB's 8.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Meta Platforms, Inc.'s or U.S. Bancorp's?

USB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to META's 88/100 (Very Safe). USB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.