Compare StocksMETA vs TRGP

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, META is fairly valued at $577, with a DCF intrinsic value of $679 and a margin of safety of 15%. TRGP is overvalued at $259, with an intrinsic value of $50 and a margin of safety of -422%. Of the two, META has the wider margin of safety.

META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$577.22
VS
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
$258.58

Rewards

META
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 81.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TRGP
  • Targa Resources Corp. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.97 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

META
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Insiders have sold $6.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
TRGP
  • High leverage (5.82x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $2.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.7% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
META
TRGP
Valuation
$46.11B
Free Cash Flow
$-318.55M
3.15%
FCF Yield
-0.57%
21.00
Trailing P/E
26.41
15.93
Forward P/E
21.01
Quality & Moat
20.87%
ROIC
12.21%
32.93%
ROE
74.10%
81.94%
Gross Margin
41.77%
0.87
PEG Ratio
1.25
Balance Sheet Safety
0.02
Net Debt / Equity
5.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.65
0.35%
Dividend Yield
1.64%
META: 9Ties: 1TRGP: 2
METATRGP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TRGP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TRGP
$8.45
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
META
14.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 14.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $577.22
Fair Value: $678.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TRGP
132.2% Overvalued
Price is 132.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $258.58
Fair Value: $111.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $577?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TRGP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TRGP
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TRGP
-3.07
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 79.3%Retail & Other 20.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,597
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TRGP
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 1.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,409
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TRGP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
META
4
Sells (3M)
63
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $58.33M
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$326,227
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,932
@ $628.00 · 2025-11-04
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$339,152
@ $656.00 · 2025-11-03
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$390,807
@ $753.00 · 2025-10-28
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,528
@ $749.57 · 2025-10-27
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$382,176
@ $736.37 · 2025-10-21
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$372,912
@ $721.30 · 2025-10-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$333,391
@ $716.97 · 2025-10-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$367,374
@ $707.85 · 2025-10-14
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$368,797
@ $713.34 · 2025-10-13
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$372,113
@ $716.98 · 2025-10-07
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$364,387
@ $704.81 · 2025-10-06
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$384,838
@ $741.50 · 2025-09-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,088
@ $748.72 · 2025-09-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$399,215
@ $769.20 · 2025-09-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$403,948
@ $781.33 · 2025-09-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$398,156
@ $767.16 · 2025-09-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$352,224
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$391,612
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$393,142
@ $757.50 · 2025-09-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,671
@ $755.65 · 2025-09-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$376,924
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$375,471
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$389,494
@ $750.47 · 2025-08-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,392
@ $755.11 · 2025-08-25
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$402,225
@ $775.00 · 2025-08-18
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$2.44M
@ $780.95 · 2025-08-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$13.02M
@ $777.15 · 2025-08-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$364,709
@ $784.32 · 2025-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TRGP
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.68M
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$2.71M
@ $255.96 · 2026-05-12
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$5.93M
@ $241.34 · 2026-03-05
BRANSTETTER BENJAMIN J
Officer
$778,124
@ $238.83 · 2026-03-02
MCDONIE PATRICK J
Officer
$7.55M
@ $239.36 · 2026-03-02
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$100,797
@ $231.72 · 2026-02-26
PRYOR DOUGLAS SCOTT
Officer
$4.01M
@ $228.92 · 2026-02-25
KNEALE JENNIFER R
President
$6.79M
@ $230.12 · 2026-02-24
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$311,619
@ $229.30 · 2026-02-24
SHRADER GERALD R
General Counsel
$498,328
@ $181.21 · 2025-12-05
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$208,042
@ $198.14 · 2025-02-28
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$1.26M
@ $202.91 · 2025-02-28
KNEALE JENNIFER R
Officer
$5.75M
@ $192.42 · 2025-02-25
MELOY MATTHEW J
Chief Executive Officer
$9.53M
@ $195.08 · 2025-02-25
DAVIS WATERS S IV
Director
$429,802
@ $196.26 · 2025-02-25
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$378,167
@ $194.23 · 2025-02-25
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$505,736
@ $202.29 · 2024-12-02
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$1.91M
@ $190.52 · 2024-11-15
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$621,809
@ $190.74 · 2024-11-08
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$3.43M
@ $190.03 · 2024-11-08
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$1.14M
@ $190.68 · 2024-11-08
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$365,504
@ $146.20 · 2024-09-03
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$1.40M
@ $140.04 · 2024-08-14
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$688,134
@ $137.63 · 2024-08-12
SHRADER GERALD R
General Counsel
$408,195
@ $136.06 · 2024-08-09
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$1.87M
@ $134.74 · 2024-08-08
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$160,146
@ $132.02 · 2024-08-06
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$1.29M
@ $130.31 · 2024-06-28
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$13,000
@ $130.00 · 2024-06-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
META
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TRGP
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
META
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
TRGP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View META Full AnalysisView TRGP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: META vs TRGP

Is Meta Platforms, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, META trades at a 14.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $679 vs. price $577), compared to TRGP's -421.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $50 vs. $259).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while TRGP scores 54/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Targa Resources Corp. in financial distress?

TRGP's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. META scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) generates a 3.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Targa Resources Corp.'s -0.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?

META earns 20.9% ROIC versus TRGP's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Meta Platforms, Inc.'s or Targa Resources Corp.'s?

META's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to TRGP's 64/100 (Safe). META has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.