Compare StocksMETA vs SMCI

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, META is fairly valued at $674, with a DCF intrinsic value of $647 and a margin of safety of -4%. SMCI is undervalued at $40, with an intrinsic value of $170 and a margin of safety of 76%. Of the two, SMCI has the wider margin of safety.

META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$673.66
VS
SMCI
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$40.06

Rewards

META
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 81.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
SMCI
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.99 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 12.3x is 24% below the historical average of 16.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

META
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $7.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
SMCI
  • ROIC has declined by 19.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 10.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 24% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
META
SMCI
Valuation
$46.11B
Free Cash Flow
$-8.25B
2.69%
FCF Yield
-31.34%
25.39
Trailing P/E
12.29
19.27
Forward P/E
7.52
Quality & Moat
16.81%
ROIC
17.40%
29.85%
ROE
21.47%
81.75%
Gross Margin
10.82%
0.88
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
0.08
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.61
0.31%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
META: 7Ties: 3SMCI: 2
METASMCI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SMCI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SMCI
$2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
META
4.1% Overvalued
Price is 4.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $673.66
Fair Value: $647.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SMCI
76.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 76.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $40.06
Fair Value: $170.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $674?

+12.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.3%

The market implies +12.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SMCI

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SMCI
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SMCI
0.06
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 20.8%
No. of Institutional Holders6,609
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SMCI
Insiders 12.7%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,117
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SMCI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
META
5
Sells (3M)
47
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $43.41M
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$2.00M
@ $618.06 · 2026-09-03
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.38M
@ $558.00 · 2026-08-18
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$847,581
@ $543.67 · 2026-08-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$280,780
@ $561.56 · 2026-08-03
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$303,875
@ $607.75 · 2026-07-01
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$326,227
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,932
@ $628.00 · 2025-11-04
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$339,152
@ $656.00 · 2025-11-03
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$390,807
@ $753.00 · 2025-10-28
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,528
@ $749.57 · 2025-10-27
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$382,176
@ $736.37 · 2025-10-21
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$372,912
@ $721.30 · 2025-10-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$333,391
@ $716.97 · 2025-10-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SMCI
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.19M
LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$7.72M
@ $38.59 · 2026-09-04
TUAN SHERMAN
Director
$1.60M
@ $33.00 · 2025-11-26
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.87M
@ $32.83 · 2025-11-24
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $45.14 · 2025-09-15
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $40.29 · 2025-09-03
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.76M
@ $43.88 · 2025-08-22
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$12.00M
@ $60.00 · 2025-07-28
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$13.50M
@ $45.00 · 2025-06-18
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$2.95M
@ $44.02 · 2025-05-20
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$8.99M
@ $44.95 · 2025-05-14
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.30M
@ $45.86 · 2025-05-14
BLAIR ROBERT L
Director
$828,557
@ $42.58 · 2025-02-28
LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.32M
@ $50.17 · 2025-02-26
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$3.62M
@ $50.48 · 2025-02-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
META
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SMCI
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
META
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
SMCI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
View META Full AnalysisView SMCI Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: META vs SMCI

Is Meta Platforms, Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SMCI trades at a 76.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $170 vs. price $40), compared to META's -4.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $647 vs. $674).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc.?

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while SMCI scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc.?

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) generates a 2.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s -31.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc.?

SMCI earns 17.4% ROIC versus META's 16.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Does Super Micro Computer, Inc. have accounting red flags?

SMCI's Beneish M-Score of 0.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, META scores -3.0, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

META vs SMCI: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io