Compare Stocks › META vs POOL

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Pool Corporation (POOL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, META is undervalued at $615, with a DCF intrinsic value of $964 and a margin of safety of 36%. POOL is overvalued at $206, with an intrinsic value of $165 and a margin of safety of -25%. Of the two, META has the wider margin of safety.

META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$614.99
VS
POOL
Pool Corporation
$205.95

Rewards

META
  • ★Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
POOL
  • ★Pool Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Pool Corporation scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

META
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $7.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
POOL
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
META
POOL
Valuation
$46.11B
Free Cash Flow
$360.87M
2.93%
FCF Yield
4.91%
20.98
Trailing P/E
18.89
17.28
Forward P/E
17.93
Quality & Moat
17.46%
ROIC
17.93%
32.26%
ROE
30.38%
81.03%
Gross Margin
29.42%
0.80
PEG Ratio
1.60
Balance Sheet Safety
0.12
Net Debt / Equity
1.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.21
0.34%
Dividend Yield
2.52%
META: 6Ties: 3POOL: 3
METAPOOL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

POOL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
POOL
$-4.14
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$831.9M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.44B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
META
36.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 36.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $614.99
Fair Value: $963.95
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
POOL
25.2% Overvalued
Price is 25.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $205.95
Fair Value: $164.56
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $615?

+11.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.2%

The market implies +11.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +15.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

POOL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $206?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.4%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
POOL
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
POOL
-2.15
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.5%Retail & Other 22.3%
No. of Institutional Holders6,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
POOL
Insiders 3.6%Institutions 114.8%
No. of Institutional Holders804
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
POOL
0
Buys (3M)
13
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.69M
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$557.00
@ $185.67 · 2026-05-28
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.76M
@ $175.95 · 2026-05-13
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$99,981
@ $190.44 · 2026-05-08
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.90M
@ $190.00 · 2026-05-07
STOKELY JOHN E
Director
$193,065
@ $193.06 · 2026-05-07
HOPE JAMES D
Director
$90,209
@ $194.42 · 2026-05-07
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$9,127
@ $202.82 · 2026-03-26
HART MELANIE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$1,620
@ $202.50 · 2026-03-25
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.02M
@ $205.00 · 2026-03-13
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.09M
@ $218.00 · 2026-03-02
HOPE JAMES D
Director
$300,162
@ $213.64 · 2026-02-25
ST ROMAIN KENNETH G
Officer
$1.22M
@ $218.67 · 2026-02-23
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,996
@ $243.14 · 2025-11-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,932
@ $319.00 · 2025-08-28
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$9,005
@ $300.17 · 2025-05-29
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,164
@ $326.56 · 2025-03-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$7,966
@ $379.33 · 2024-11-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
META
3
Sells (3M)
39
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.55M
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$2.00M
@ $618.06 · 2026-09-03
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.38M
@ $558.00 · 2026-08-18
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$847,581
@ $543.67 · 2026-08-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$280,780
@ $561.56 · 2026-08-03
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$303,875
@ $607.75 · 2026-07-01
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
POOL
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.94M
NEIL JENNIFER M
Officer
$103,429
@ $203.60 · 2026-03-24
HART MELANIE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$605,000
@ $220.00 · 2026-02-24
ARVAN PETER D.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.23M
@ $245.57 · 2025-12-02
NEIL JENNIFER M
Officer
$385,245
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-31
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$9.58M
@ $348.41 · 2025-02-25
HOUSEY HART MELANIE MONROE
Chief Financial Officer
$799,006
@ $345.59 · 2025-02-24
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$3.46M
@ $346.00 · 2025-02-24
NEIL JENNIFER M
General Counsel
$256,251
@ $373.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
META
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
POOL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
META
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
POOL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View META Full AnalysisView POOL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: META vs POOL

Is Meta Platforms, Inc. or Pool Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, META trades at a 36.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $964 vs. price $615), compared to POOL's -25.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $165 vs. $206).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Pool Corporation?▼

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while POOL scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Pool Corporation?▼

Pool Corporation (POOL) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Meta Platforms, Inc.'s 2.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Meta Platforms, Inc. or Pool Corporation?▼

POOL earns 17.9% ROIC versus META's 17.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Meta Platforms, Inc.'s or Pool Corporation's?▼

POOL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to META's 88/100 (Very Safe). POOL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.