Compare StocksMDT vs PFE

Medtronic plc (MDT) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MDT is fairly valued at $79, with a DCF intrinsic value of $79 and a margin of safety of 0%. PFE is overvalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, MDT has the wider margin of safety.

MDT
Medtronic plc
$79.34
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.21

Rewards

MDT
  • Gross margin of 65.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.2x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

MDT
    PFE
    • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    MDT
    PFE
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $12.38B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    8.61%
    21.05
    Trailing P/E
    19.24
    12.38
    Forward P/E
    8.91
    Quality & Moat
    7.92%
    ROIC
    10.19%
    9.93%
    ROE
    8.31%
    65.38%
    Gross Margin
    74.80%
    1.60
    PEG Ratio
    13.77
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.40
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.57
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.95
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.03
    3.54%
    Dividend Yield
    6.61%
    MDT: 3Ties: 2PFE: 5
    MDTPFE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    MDT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PFE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    MDT
    $16.10
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.23B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$19.72B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PFE
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-10.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-146.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    MDT
    0.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 0.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $79.34
    Fair Value: $79.42
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PFE
    12.3% Overvalued
    Price is 12.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $25.21
    Fair Value: $22.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    MDT

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PFE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

    +5.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.5%

    The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    MDT
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PFE
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    MDT
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PFE
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    MDT
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 10.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,027
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PFE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 30.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,744
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    MDT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $462,750
    JELLISON WILLIAM R
    Director
    $462,750
    @ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PFE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BLAYLOCK RONALD E
    Director
    $499,072
    @ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
    GOTTLIEB SCOTT
    Director
    $28,240
    @ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    MDT
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.32M
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $336,965
    @ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $5.13M
    @ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
    SMITH GREGORY L
    Officer
    $3.06M
    @ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $788,048
    @ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
    WALL BRETT A
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
    WALL BRETT A
    Officer
    $792,038
    @ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PFE
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $51,400
    DAMICO JENNIFER B.
    Officer
    $51,400
    @ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
    DAMICO JENNIFER B.
    Officer
    $64,825
    @ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
    DAMICO JENNIFER B.
    Officer
    $147,714
    @ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    MDT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PFE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    MDT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    PFE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View MDT Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: MDT vs PFE

    Is Medtronic plc or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MDT trades at a 0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $79 vs. price $79), compared to PFE's -12.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $25).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Medtronic plc or Pfizer Inc.?

    MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

    PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDT scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Medtronic plc or Pfizer Inc.?

    PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus MDT's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Medtronic plc's or Pfizer Inc.'s?

    MDT's dividend earns a safety score of 49/100 (Borderline), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). MDT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.