Compare StocksMDLZ vs UNH

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with a DCF intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

MDLZ
    UNH
    • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    MDLZ
      UNH
      • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
      • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
      • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      UNH
      Valuation
      $2.85B
      Free Cash Flow
      $17.69B
      3.69%
      FCF Yield
      4.86%
      29.76
      Trailing P/E
      30.17
      17.75
      Forward P/E
      19.18
      Quality & Moat
      6.09%
      ROIC
      15.60%
      10.16%
      ROE
      12.18%
      28.77%
      Gross Margin
      18.80%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      1.41
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.78
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.44
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.85
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.18
      3.22%
      Dividend Yield
      2.21%
      MDLZ: 4Ties: 2UNH: 6
      MDLZUNH

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      UNH

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      UNH
      $-7.37
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $26.63B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-196.16B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      UNH
      6.6% Overvalued
      Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $400.96
      Fair Value: $376.14
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      UNH

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

      +14.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +9.8%

      The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      UNH
      73/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      UNH
      -2.45
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      UNH
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,020
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      UNH
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
      Chief Executive Officer
      $25.02M
      @ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
      REX JOHN F
      President
      $5.00M
      @ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
      GIL KRISTEN
      Director
      $1.00M
      @ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
      FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
      Director
      $491,786
      @ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
      NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
      Director
      $93,647
      @ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
      FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
      Director
      $511,575
      @ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      UNH
      1
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $284,000
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
      Officer
      $284,000
      @ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
      Chief Executive Officer
      $179,645
      @ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      UNH
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(68/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      UNH
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
      View MDLZ Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: MDLZ vs UNH

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to MDLZ's -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $35 vs. $60).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mondelez International, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. in financial distress?

      MDLZ's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Mondelez International, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Mondelez International, Inc.'s 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mondelez International, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UNH earns 15.6% ROIC versus MDLZ's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Mondelez International, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

      UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDLZ's 39/100 (Unsafe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.