SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › MDLZ vs QCOM

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with a DCF intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. QCOM is overvalued at $226, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, MDLZ has the wider margin of safety.

MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11

Rewards

MDLZ
    QCOM
    • ★QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    MDLZ
      QCOM
      • ⚠FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
      • ⚠15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      QCOM
      Valuation
      $2.85B
      Free Cash Flow
      $12.82B
      3.69%
      FCF Yield
      5.38%
      29.76
      Trailing P/E
      24.34
      17.75
      Forward P/E
      21.20
      Quality & Moat
      6.09%
      ROIC
      18.22%
      10.16%
      ROE
      36.08%
      28.77%
      Gross Margin
      54.80%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      0.91
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.78
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.20
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.85
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.42
      3.22%
      Dividend Yield
      1.72%
      MDLZ: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 9
      MDLZQCOM

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      QCOM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      QCOM
      $5.06
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $11.96B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$60.46B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      QCOM
      178.3% Overvalued
      Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $226.11
      Fair Value: $81.25
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      QCOM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

      +17.5%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +7.0%

      The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      QCOM
      73/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      QCOM
      -3.16
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      QCOM
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,615
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      QCOM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      QCOM
      3
      Sells (3M)
      15
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $12.65M
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $493,380
      @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $529,741
      @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $325,854
      @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $330,815
      @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $458,799
      @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $577,620
      @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.20M
      @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $2.83M
      @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $1.28M
      @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $567,702
      @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.38M
      @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $522,808
      @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $122,463
      @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $493,610
      @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $537,560
      @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $486,965
      @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $120,808
      @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $465,846
      @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $91,442
      @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $119,900
      @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $235,262
      @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $523,292
      @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $130,074
      @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $509,397
      @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $3.28M
      @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $463,851
      @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $409,056
      @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $1.67M
      @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $1.24M
      @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $484,617
      @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $202,120
      @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $491,349
      @ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
      THOMPSON JAMES H.
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.38M
      @ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $313,779
      @ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $539,157
      @ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
      THOMPSON JAMES H.
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      QCOM
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(50/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      QCOM
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
      View MDLZ Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: MDLZ vs QCOM

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, MDLZ trades at a -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $35 vs. price $60), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mondelez International, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?▼

      QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. in financial distress?▼

      MDLZ's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Mondelez International, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?▼

      QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Mondelez International, Inc.'s 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mondelez International, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?▼

      QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus MDLZ's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Mondelez International, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?▼

      QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDLZ's 39/100 (Unsafe). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.