Compare StocksMDLZ vs ORCL

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with a DCF intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. ORCL is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $285 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.29

Rewards

MDLZ
    ORCL
    • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

    Risks

    MDLZ
      ORCL
      • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
      • High leverage (2.89x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
      • Insiders have sold $2.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      ORCL
      Valuation
      $2.85B
      Free Cash Flow
      $-20.34B
      3.69%
      FCF Yield
      -3.84%
      29.76
      Trailing P/E
      31.56
      17.75
      Forward P/E
      16.89
      Quality & Moat
      6.09%
      ROIC
      9.68%
      10.16%
      ROE
      53.38%
      28.77%
      Gross Margin
      65.82%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      1.06
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.78
      Net Debt / Equity
      2.89
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.85
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      3.92
      3.22%
      Dividend Yield
      1.09%
      MDLZ: 5Ties: 4ORCL: 3
      MDLZORCL

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      ORCL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      ORCL
      $17.69
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $18.61B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$329.28B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      ORCL
      35.4% Margin of Safety
      Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $184.29
      Fair Value: $285.39
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      ORCL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      ORCL
      68/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      ORCL
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      ORCL
      Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.0%Retail & Other 15.5%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,512
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      ORCL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $112,258
      FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
      Director
      $112,258
      @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
      MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
      Director
      $947,913
      @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      ORCL
      1
      Sells (3M)
      19
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.89B
      LEVEY STUART A
      Officer
      $2.64M
      @ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.55M
      @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
      KEHRING DOUGLAS A
      Officer
      $6.82M
      @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
      HURA MARK
      Officer
      $2.95M
      @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $437,064
      @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.93M
      @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
      SMITH MARIA
      Officer
      $2.80M
      @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $11.07M
      @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
      LEVEY STUART A
      Officer
      $5.93M
      @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $641,958
      @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $10.87M
      @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $5.12M
      @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      President
      $6.31M
      @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $4.04M
      @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $770,656
      @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
      SMITH MARIA
      Officer
      $2.33M
      @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $267.24M
      @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $794.64M
      @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $764.01M
      @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
      CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
      Director
      $1.74M
      @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Officer
      $3.21M
      @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $428,562
      @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $291,620
      @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $705.46M
      @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
      SMITH MARIA
      Officer
      $1.04M
      @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
      ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
      Chief Technology Officer
      $322.05M
      @ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
      SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
      Officer
      $60.58M
      @ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
      SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
      Officer
      $5.22M
      @ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
      SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
      Officer
      $34.04M
      @ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      ORCL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(32/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      ORCL
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
      View MDLZ Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: MDLZ vs ORCL

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $285 vs. price $184), compared to MDLZ's -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $35 vs. $60).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mondelez International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

      ORCL scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. in financial distress?

      MDLZ's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Mondelez International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

      Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) generates a 3.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mondelez International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

      ORCL earns 9.7% ROIC versus MDLZ's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Mondelez International, Inc.'s or Oracle Corporation's?

      ORCL's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to MDLZ's 39/100 (Unsafe). ORCL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

      MDLZ vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io