Compare StocksMDLZ vs NOW

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) vs ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with a DCF intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. NOW is overvalued at $95, with an intrinsic value of $85 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, NOW has the wider margin of safety.

MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12
VS
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$95.04

Rewards

MDLZ
    NOW
    • Gross margin of 76.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    MDLZ
      NOW
      • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
      • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
      • 6 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      NOW
      Valuation
      $2.85B
      Free Cash Flow
      $5.11B
      3.69%
      FCF Yield
      5.21%
      29.76
      Trailing P/E
      56.57
      17.75
      Forward P/E
      18.91
      Quality & Moat
      6.09%
      ROIC
      10.39%
      10.16%
      ROE
      16.07%
      28.77%
      Gross Margin
      76.56%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      0.98
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.78
      Net Debt / Equity
      Net cash
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.85
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      -0.95
      3.22%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      MDLZ: 3Ties: 2NOW: 7
      MDLZNOW

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      NOW

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      NOW
      $16.65
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $4.90B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$81.66B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      NOW
      11.8% Overvalued
      Price is 11.8% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $95.04
      Fair Value: $84.98
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      NOW

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $95?

      +21.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +6.8%

      The market implies +21.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      NOW
      61/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      NOW
      -2.87
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      NOW
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.5%Retail & Other 11.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,080
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      NOW
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $3.00M
      MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.00M
      @ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      NOW
      6
      Sells (3M)
      40
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $24.71M
      BRIGGS TERESA
      Director
      $173,376
      @ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $103,238
      @ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
      CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
      Director
      $130,845
      @ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
      SANDS ANITA M
      Director
      $1.48M
      @ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $13,661
      @ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $799,868
      @ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $376,142
      @ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $1.02M
      @ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
      MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
      Officer
      $147,994
      @ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
      CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
      Director
      $151,755
      @ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
      MASTANTUONO GINA
      President
      $352,750
      @ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
      CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
      Director
      $242,400
      @ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
      MASTANTUONO GINA
      President
      $336,936
      @ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
      JACKSON LAWRENCE
      Director
      $214,708
      @ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $200,549
      @ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $249,353
      @ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
      ELMER RUSSELL S.
      General Counsel
      $160,155
      @ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
      TZITZON NICHOLAS
      Officer
      $431,736
      @ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
      MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
      Officer
      $235,894
      @ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $56,257
      @ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
      ELMER RUSSELL S.
      General Counsel
      $52,848
      @ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $222,012
      @ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
      ELMER RUSSELL S.
      General Counsel
      $164,997
      @ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
      SANDS ANITA M
      Director
      $1.00M
      @ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
      MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
      Chief Executive Officer
      $5.34M
      @ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
      FIPPS PAUL
      Officer
      $1.30M
      @ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
      ELMER RUSSELL S.
      General Counsel
      $1.50M
      @ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
      MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.43M
      @ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $1.35M
      @ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
      MASTANTUONO GINA
      President
      $1.53M
      @ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
      TZITZON NICHOLAS
      Officer
      $1.49M
      @ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
      MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
      Officer
      $238,496
      @ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
      CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
      Director
      $258,000
      @ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $57,658
      @ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
      MASTANTUONO GINA
      President
      $72,288
      @ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $225,746
      @ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
      MASTANTUONO GINA
      President
      $256,490
      @ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
      JACKSON LAWRENCE
      Director
      $749,805
      @ $990.50 · 2025-07-29
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $341,631
      @ $965.06 · 2025-07-16
      SANDS ANITA M
      Director
      $250,950
      @ $1050.00 · 2025-07-03
      MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
      Officer
      $283,310
      @ $1011.82 · 2025-06-03
      SANDS ANITA M
      Director
      $250,267
      @ $1009.14 · 2025-06-02
      CANNEY JACQUELINE P
      Officer
      $147,900
      @ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
      MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.07M
      @ $1012.01 · 2025-05-30
      TZITZON NICHOLAS
      Officer
      $1.19M
      @ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
      SANDS ANITA M
      Director
      $433,825
      @ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
      BRIGGS TERESA
      Director
      $216,913
      @ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
      LUDDY FREDERIC B
      Director
      $428,000
      @ $1000.00 · 2025-05-23
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      NOW
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(25/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      MDLZ
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      NOW
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
      View MDLZ Full AnalysisView NOW Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: MDLZ vs NOW

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, NOW trades at a -11.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $85 vs. price $95), compared to MDLZ's -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $35 vs. $60).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mondelez International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

      NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Mondelez International, Inc. in financial distress?

      MDLZ's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NOW scores 8.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Mondelez International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

      ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) generates a 5.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Mondelez International, Inc.'s 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mondelez International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

      NOW earns 10.4% ROIC versus MDLZ's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.