Compare StocksMCO vs PFE

Moody's Corporation (MCO) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

MCO
Moody's Corporation
$435.80
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

MCO
  • Moody's Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 74.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Moody's Corporation scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

MCO
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $7.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MCO
PFE
Valuation
$2.06B
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
2.65%
FCF Yield
8.61%
31.86
Trailing P/E
20.15
23.29
Forward P/E
9.69
Quality & Moat
22.07%
ROIC
7.67%
58.48%
ROE
8.96%
74.44%
Gross Margin
75.81%
0.55
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.77
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.33
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
0.95%
Dividend Yield
6.28%
MCO: 3Ties: 2PFE: 6
MCOPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MCO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MCO
$9.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$39.65B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MCO
24.3% Overvalued
Price is 24.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $435.80
Fair Value: $350.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MCO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $436?

+14.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.2%

The market implies +14.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +17.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MCO
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MCO
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MCO
Insiders 14.0%Institutions 79.2%Retail & Other 6.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,993
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MCO
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MCO
8
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.09M
WEST MICHAEL L
Officer
$2.01M
@ $473.72 · 2026-03-04
HEULAND NOEMIE CLEMENCE
Chief Financial Officer
$46,587
@ $465.87 · 2026-03-04
PHILLIPS JASON D
Officer
$157,437
@ $472.78 · 2026-03-04
STEELE RICHARD G
General Counsel
$171,266
@ $456.71 · 2026-03-03
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $456.71 · 2026-03-03
WEST MICHAEL L
Officer
$1.58M
@ $474.10 · 2026-02-26
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$592,428
@ $507.65 · 2026-02-03
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$590,241
@ $505.78 · 2026-01-05
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$280,525
@ $487.87 · 2025-12-03
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$287,765
@ $486.09 · 2025-12-01
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$558,935
@ $478.95 · 2025-11-03
STEELE RICHARD G
General Counsel
$12,841
@ $493.88 · 2025-10-28
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$269,669
@ $493.90 · 2025-10-28
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$199,652
@ $481.09 · 2025-10-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$197,880
@ $477.97 · 2025-10-01
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$212,750
@ $512.65 · 2025-09-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$208,878
@ $503.32 · 2025-09-02
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$216,402
@ $521.45 · 2025-08-15
TULENKO STEPHEN T
Officer
$155,688
@ $518.96 · 2025-08-04
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$211,729
@ $510.19 · 2025-08-01
TULENKO STEPHEN T
Officer
$1.08M
@ $511.30 · 2025-07-30
WEST MICHAEL L
Officer
$1.89M
@ $511.16 · 2025-07-29
HEULAND NOEMIE CLEMENCE
Chief Financial Officer
$456,109
@ $508.48 · 2025-07-29
STEELE RICHARD G
General Counsel
$741,360
@ $508.83 · 2025-07-29
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$208,911
@ $503.40 · 2025-07-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$206,296
@ $497.10 · 2025-07-01
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$197,818
@ $476.67 · 2025-06-16
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$196,855
@ $474.35 · 2025-06-02
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$198,806
@ $479.05 · 2025-05-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$187,045
@ $450.71 · 2025-05-01
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$181,687
@ $437.80 · 2025-04-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$192,178
@ $463.08 · 2025-04-01
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$184,438
@ $444.43 · 2025-03-17
TULENKO STEPHEN T
Officer
$2.43M
@ $483.19 · 2025-03-05
STEELE RICHARD G
General Counsel
$136,614
@ $494.98 · 2025-03-04
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.48M
@ $493.90 · 2025-03-04
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$141,905
@ $505.00 · 2025-03-03
TULENKO STEPHEN T
Officer
$1.74M
@ $500.03 · 2025-02-26
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$146,738
@ $522.20 · 2025-02-18
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$138,932
@ $494.42 · 2025-02-03
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$133,087
@ $473.62 · 2025-01-15
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$133,436
@ $474.86 · 2025-01-02
FAUBER ROBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$137,757
@ $490.24 · 2024-12-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MCO
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MCO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View MCO Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis