Compare StocksMCK vs MS

McKesson Corporation (MCK) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MCK is undervalued at $856, with a DCF intrinsic value of $140987785214 and a margin of safety of 100%. MS is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, MCK has the wider margin of safety.

MCK
McKesson Corporation
$856.19
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42

Rewards

MCK
  • McKesson Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • McKesson Corporation scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.28 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MCK
  • Gross margin of 3.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $23.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MCK
MS
Valuation
$5.66B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
22.32
Trailing P/E
17.01
17.00
Forward P/E
15.45
Quality & Moat
80.13%
ROIC
3.68%
N/A
ROE
14.08%
3.60%
Gross Margin
87.64%
1.67
PEG Ratio
1.99
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.44%
Dividend Yield
2.19%
MCK: 2Ties: 1MS: 4
MCKMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MCK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MCK
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$10.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$393.21
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MCK
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $856.19
Fair Value: $140987785214.23
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MCK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $856?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MCK
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MCK
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MCK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 95.3%Retail & Other 4.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,655
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MCK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MCK
8
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $44.63M
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$6.72M
@ $793.56 · 2026-07-07
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$6.56M
@ $775.13 · 2026-06-17
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$3.76M
@ $763.00 · 2026-06-09
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$101,612
@ $764.00 · 2026-06-05
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$604,420
@ $735.30 · 2026-06-02
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$1.33M
@ $735.50 · 2026-06-01
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$1.82M
@ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$2.70M
@ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$2.70M
@ $990.00 · 2026-03-02
MARTINEZ MARIA N.
Director
$328,013
@ $939.87 · 2026-02-19
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$179,550
@ $945.00 · 2026-02-17
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$282,817
@ $933.39 · 2026-02-11
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$313,240
@ $955.00 · 2026-02-06
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$225,266
@ $816.18 · 2026-01-05
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$283,476
@ $861.63 · 2025-11-07
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$8.42M
@ $705.63 · 2025-08-22
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$8.09M
@ $677.76 · 2025-08-15
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$218,347
@ $663.67 · 2025-08-08
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$13.72M
@ $708.09 · 2025-07-11
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$13.67M
@ $705.93 · 2025-06-06
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$2.06M
@ $712.18 · 2025-05-30
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$366,134
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$68,201
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$244,807
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.35M
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$749,360
@ $714.36 · 2025-05-27
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$115,154
@ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$523,556
@ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$895,190
@ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$4.54M
@ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$394,495
@ $726.51 · 2025-05-19
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.68M
@ $634.24 · 2025-03-06
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.59M
@ $624.00 · 2025-02-28
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$188,760
@ $605.00 · 2025-02-25
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $597.99 · 2025-02-21
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.38M
@ $600.66 · 2025-02-14
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$114,603
@ $609.59 · 2025-02-12
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$331,645
@ $572.79 · 2025-01-02
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$349,027
@ $602.81 · 2024-12-09
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.11M
@ $561.10 · 2024-09-05
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $626.03 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MCK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MCK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View MCK Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MCK vs MS

Is McKesson Corporation or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MCK trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $140987785214 vs. price $856), compared to MS's 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $269 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, McKesson Corporation or Morgan Stanley?

MCK scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MCK scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, McKesson Corporation or Morgan Stanley?

MCK earns 80.1% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, McKesson Corporation's or Morgan Stanley's?

MCK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). MCK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MCK vs MS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io