Compare StocksLMT vs MCD

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs McDonald's Corporation (MCD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, LMT is overvalued at $583, with a DCF intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of -50%. MCD is undervalued at $271, with an intrinsic value of $148031152417 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, MCD has the wider margin of safety.

LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$582.74
VS
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
$270.64

Rewards

LMT
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
MCD
  • McDonald's Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • McDonald's Corporation scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

LMT
  • Gross margin of 11.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
MCD
  • PEG ratio of 2.60 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LMT
MCD
Valuation
$5.56B
Free Cash Flow
$5.95B
4.14%
FCF Yield
N/A
21.50
Trailing P/E
22.33
17.81
Forward P/E
19.17
Quality & Moat
24.82%
ROIC
17.48%
89.17%
ROE
N/A
11.80%
Gross Margin
57.35%
1.21
PEG Ratio
2.60
Balance Sheet Safety
1.91
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.61
2.37%
Dividend Yield
2.75%
LMT: 4Ties: 2MCD: 3
LMTMCD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LMT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MCD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LMT
$-1.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$8.03B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MCD
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$10.74B
Δ Market Cap
+$42.1
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LMT
49.8% Overvalued
Price is 49.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $582.74
Fair Value: $388.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MCD
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $270.64
Fair Value: $148031152416.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LMT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $583?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MCD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $271?

-8.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -3.3%

The market implies -8.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -3.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LMT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MCD
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LMT
-2.23
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MCD
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LMT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,330
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MCD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 77.2%Retail & Other 22.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,363
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LMT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MCD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LMT
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.29M
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
ULMER GREGORY M
Officer
$1.87M
@ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.59M
@ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
ST JOHN FRANK A
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.42M
@ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
Officer
$312,923
@ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$2.12M
@ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MCD
3
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $43.41M
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$1.49M
@ $284.32 · 2026-06-10
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$769,109
@ $278.36 · 2026-05-28
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$93,277
@ $280.11 · 2026-05-26
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$100,806
@ $302.72 · 2026-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$806,182
@ $307.00 · 2026-04-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$104,386
@ $313.47 · 2026-03-23
BARONI DARIO
Officer
$194,262
@ $323.77 · 2026-03-18
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$862,221
@ $328.34 · 2026-03-10
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.07M
@ $333.32 · 2026-02-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$110,033
@ $330.43 · 2026-02-23
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$17.47M
@ $332.44 · 2026-02-13
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.55M
@ $331.00 · 2026-02-12
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$854,106
@ $325.25 · 2026-02-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$805,079
@ $306.58 · 2026-01-12
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$795,520
@ $320.00 · 2025-12-16
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$207,270
@ $315.00 · 2025-12-12
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$2.01M
@ $305.50 · 2025-12-01
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$5.31M
@ $310.00 · 2025-11-21
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$977,095
@ $305.82 · 2025-11-14
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.95M
@ $300.42 · 2025-11-05
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$315,000
@ $315.00 · 2025-09-02
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.49M
@ $315.00 · 2025-08-20
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$310,000
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-19
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$770,970
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-06
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$296,216
@ $303.50 · 2025-08-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$281,221
@ $299.49 · 2025-07-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$300,000
@ $300.00 · 2025-07-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$270,920
@ $288.52 · 2025-06-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
President
$295,851
@ $315.07 · 2025-05-23
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$1.92M
@ $319.66 · 2025-05-20
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$299,072
@ $318.50 · 2025-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$287,616
@ $306.30 · 2025-03-24
BOYD TIFFANIE L
Officer
$309,270
@ $309.27 · 2025-02-27
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.23M
@ $308.71 · 2025-02-24
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$286,395
@ $305.00 · 2025-02-24
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$334,871
@ $304.71 · 2025-02-21
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$456,495
@ $304.33 · 2025-02-21
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$962,432
@ $300.76 · 2025-02-19
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.83M
@ $307.41 · 2025-02-13
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $310.05 · 2025-02-11
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$84,225
@ $280.75 · 2025-01-23
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$436,134
@ $290.95 · 2025-01-02
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$1.98M
@ $289.89 · 2024-12-31
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$319,919
@ $291.10 · 2024-12-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,458
@ $292.50 · 2024-11-25
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$441,470
@ $294.51 · 2024-11-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,326
@ $292.38 · 2024-10-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$727,260
@ $310.00 · 2024-10-14
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.83M
@ $305.00 · 2024-09-27
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.51M
@ $300.02 · 2024-09-24
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$328,128
@ $298.57 · 2024-09-23
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $300.04 · 2024-09-23
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.18M
@ $300.00 · 2024-09-16
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$397,500
@ $300.00 · 2024-09-16
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$428,967
@ $286.36 · 2024-09-03
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$316,993
@ $288.70 · 2024-08-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LMT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MCD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LMT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
MCD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View LMT Full AnalysisView MCD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LMT vs MCD

Is Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MCD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $148031152417 vs. price $271), compared to LMT's -49.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $389 vs. $583).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation?

MCD scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while LMT scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is McDonald's Corporation in financial distress?

MCD's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LMT scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation?

LMT earns 24.8% ROIC versus MCD's 17.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Lockheed Martin Corporation's or McDonald's Corporation's?

LMT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to MCD's 69/100 (Safe). LMT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.