Compare StocksMAR vs ORCL

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MAR is overvalued at $396, with a DCF intrinsic value of $221 and a margin of safety of -80%. ORCL is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $285 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
$396.20
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.29

Rewards

MAR
  • Marriott International, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Marriott International, Inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

MAR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.32 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 41.5x is 53% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (2.89x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $2.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MAR
ORCL
Valuation
$2.61B
Free Cash Flow
$-20.34B
2.50%
FCF Yield
-3.84%
41.53
Trailing P/E
31.56
30.28
Forward P/E
16.89
Quality & Moat
19.24%
ROIC
9.68%
N/A
ROE
53.38%
79.04%
Gross Margin
65.82%
2.37
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
2.89
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.92
0.73%
Dividend Yield
1.09%
MAR: 5Ties: 1ORCL: 4
MARORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MAR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MAR
$5.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MAR
79.7% Overvalued
Price is 79.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $396.20
Fair Value: $220.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
35.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.29
Fair Value: $285.39
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MAR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $396?

+19.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.2%

The market implies +19.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MAR
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MAR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MAR
Insiders 17.9%Institutions 64.2%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,139
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.0%Retail & Other 15.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,512
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MAR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MAR
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.96M
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$1.08M
@ $361.56 · 2026-05-18
MAO YIBING
Officer
$1.67M
@ $347.72 · 2026-05-13
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$1.24M
@ $354.00 · 2026-02-19
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$716,060
@ $358.03 · 2026-02-18
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$2.26M
@ $356.61 · 2026-02-18
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.39M
@ $358.25 · 2026-02-18
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $359.81 · 2026-02-17
MARRIOTT DAVID SHEETS
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.71M
@ $360.00 · 2026-02-17
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$22.63M
@ $359.22 · 2026-02-17
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$896,784
@ $357.00 · 2026-02-13
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$494,769
@ $305.98 · 2025-12-15
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$263,280
@ $301.58 · 2025-11-25
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$584,240
@ $292.12 · 2025-11-10
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$472,065
@ $286.10 · 2025-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.57M
@ $287.11 · 2025-11-07
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$1.87M
@ $280.04 · 2025-11-06
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$670,710
@ $268.28 · 2025-06-24
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $263.90 · 2025-05-30
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$503,986
@ $272.42 · 2025-05-13
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$292,332
@ $277.62 · 2025-02-24
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$4.03M
@ $278.07 · 2025-02-21
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.61M
@ $285.63 · 2025-02-21
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $286.65 · 2025-02-21
ANAND SATYAJIT
Officer
$563,476
@ $293.63 · 2024-12-06
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$485,292
@ $284.30 · 2024-11-22
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $284.49 · 2024-11-12
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$250,140
@ $284.25 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $283.30 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$673,568
@ $285.41 · 2024-11-11
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$280,719
@ $280.72 · 2024-11-08
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$567,783
@ $278.73 · 2024-11-08
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$253,256
@ $276.48 · 2024-11-07
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$828,390
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$962,865
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$137,245
@ $274.49 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.89B
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MAR
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MAR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
View MAR Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MAR vs ORCL

Is Marriott International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $285 vs. price $184), compared to MAR's -79.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $221 vs. $396).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Marriott International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

MAR scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while ORCL scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MAR scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Marriott International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) generates a 2.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Marriott International, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

MAR earns 19.2% ROIC versus ORCL's 9.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Marriott International, Inc.'s or Oracle Corporation's?

MAR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). MAR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.