Compare StocksMAR vs NOW

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) vs ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, MAR is overvalued at $396, with a DCF intrinsic value of $221 and a margin of safety of -80%. NOW is overvalued at $95, with an intrinsic value of $85 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, NOW has the wider margin of safety.

MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
$396.20
VS
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$95.04

Rewards

MAR
  • Marriott International, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Marriott International, Inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
NOW
  • Gross margin of 76.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MAR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.32 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 41.5x is 53% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
NOW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MAR
NOW
Valuation
$2.61B
Free Cash Flow
$5.11B
2.50%
FCF Yield
5.21%
41.53
Trailing P/E
56.57
30.28
Forward P/E
18.91
Quality & Moat
19.24%
ROIC
10.39%
N/A
ROE
16.07%
79.04%
Gross Margin
76.56%
2.37
PEG Ratio
0.98
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.95
0.73%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
MAR: 3Ties: 2NOW: 5
MARNOW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MAR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MAR
$5.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MAR
79.7% Overvalued
Price is 79.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $396.20
Fair Value: $220.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NOW
11.8% Overvalued
Price is 11.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $95.04
Fair Value: $84.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MAR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $396?

+19.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.2%

The market implies +19.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $95?

+21.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.8%

The market implies +21.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MAR
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MAR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MAR
Insiders 17.9%Institutions 64.2%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,139
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.5%Retail & Other 11.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,080
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MAR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MAR
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.96M
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$1.08M
@ $361.56 · 2026-05-18
MAO YIBING
Officer
$1.67M
@ $347.72 · 2026-05-13
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$1.24M
@ $354.00 · 2026-02-19
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$716,060
@ $358.03 · 2026-02-18
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$2.26M
@ $356.61 · 2026-02-18
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.39M
@ $358.25 · 2026-02-18
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $359.81 · 2026-02-17
MARRIOTT DAVID SHEETS
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.71M
@ $360.00 · 2026-02-17
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$22.63M
@ $359.22 · 2026-02-17
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$896,784
@ $357.00 · 2026-02-13
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$494,769
@ $305.98 · 2025-12-15
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$263,280
@ $301.58 · 2025-11-25
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$584,240
@ $292.12 · 2025-11-10
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$472,065
@ $286.10 · 2025-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.57M
@ $287.11 · 2025-11-07
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$1.87M
@ $280.04 · 2025-11-06
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$670,710
@ $268.28 · 2025-06-24
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $263.90 · 2025-05-30
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$503,986
@ $272.42 · 2025-05-13
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$292,332
@ $277.62 · 2025-02-24
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$4.03M
@ $278.07 · 2025-02-21
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.61M
@ $285.63 · 2025-02-21
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $286.65 · 2025-02-21
ANAND SATYAJIT
Officer
$563,476
@ $293.63 · 2024-12-06
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$485,292
@ $284.30 · 2024-11-22
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $284.49 · 2024-11-12
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$250,140
@ $284.25 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $283.30 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$673,568
@ $285.41 · 2024-11-11
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$280,719
@ $280.72 · 2024-11-08
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$567,783
@ $278.73 · 2024-11-08
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$253,256
@ $276.48 · 2024-11-07
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$828,390
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$962,865
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$137,245
@ $274.49 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NOW
6
Sells (3M)
40
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $24.71M
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
FIPPS PAUL
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$225,746
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$749,805
@ $990.50 · 2025-07-29
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$341,631
@ $965.06 · 2025-07-16
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$250,950
@ $1050.00 · 2025-07-03
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$283,310
@ $1011.82 · 2025-06-03
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$250,267
@ $1009.14 · 2025-06-02
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$147,900
@ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.07M
@ $1012.01 · 2025-05-30
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.19M
@ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$433,825
@ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$216,913
@ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
LUDDY FREDERIC B
Director
$428,000
@ $1000.00 · 2025-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MAR
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NOW
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MAR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
NOW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View MAR Full AnalysisView NOW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MAR vs NOW

Is Marriott International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NOW trades at a -11.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $85 vs. price $95), compared to MAR's -79.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $221 vs. $396).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Marriott International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

MAR scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Marriott International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) generates a 5.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Marriott International, Inc.'s 2.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Marriott International, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

MAR earns 19.2% ROIC versus NOW's 10.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.