Compare StocksMAR vs MSFT

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MAR is overvalued at $335, with a DCF intrinsic value of $212 and a margin of safety of -58%. MSFT is undervalued at $490, with an intrinsic value of $752 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, MSFT has the wider margin of safety.

MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
$334.97
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$490.30

Rewards

MAR
  • Marriott International, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 79.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Marriott International, Inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 67.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

MAR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.32 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 35.0x is 29% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
MSFT
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $71.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MAR
MSFT
Valuation
$2.06B
Free Cash Flow
$66.99B
2.36%
FCF Yield
1.84%
34.97
Trailing P/E
27.33
25.46
Forward P/E
20.78
Quality & Moat
21.43%
ROIC
20.70%
N/A
ROE
34.04%
79.24%
Gross Margin
67.94%
1.70
PEG Ratio
1.59
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.60
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.27
0.87%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
MAR: 3Ties: 2MSFT: 5
MARMSFT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MAR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MAR
$5.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$3.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$251.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$846.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MAR
58.1% Overvalued
Price is 58.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $334.97
Fair Value: $211.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
34.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $490.30
Fair Value: $751.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MAR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $335?

+17.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.4%

The market implies +17.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +20.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $490?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.6%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +21.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MAR
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MAR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MAR
Insiders 18.1%Institutions 63.6%Retail & Other 18.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,267
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders8,175
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MAR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MAR
0
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.29M
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$1.08M
@ $361.56 · 2026-05-18
MAO YIBING
Officer
$1.67M
@ $347.72 · 2026-05-13
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$1.24M
@ $354.00 · 2026-02-19
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.39M
@ $358.25 · 2026-02-18
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$716,060
@ $358.03 · 2026-02-18
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$2.26M
@ $356.61 · 2026-02-18
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $359.81 · 2026-02-17
MARRIOTT DAVID SHEETS
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.71M
@ $360.00 · 2026-02-17
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$22.63M
@ $359.22 · 2026-02-17
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$896,784
@ $357.00 · 2026-02-13
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$494,769
@ $305.98 · 2025-12-15
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$263,280
@ $301.58 · 2025-11-25
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$584,240
@ $292.12 · 2025-11-10
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$472,065
@ $286.10 · 2025-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.57M
@ $287.11 · 2025-11-07
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$1.87M
@ $280.04 · 2025-11-06
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$670,710
@ $268.28 · 2025-06-24
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $263.90 · 2025-05-30
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$503,986
@ $272.42 · 2025-05-13
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$292,332
@ $277.62 · 2025-02-24
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.61M
@ $285.63 · 2025-02-21
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$4.03M
@ $278.07 · 2025-02-21
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $286.65 · 2025-02-21
ANAND SATYAJIT
Officer
$563,476
@ $293.63 · 2024-12-06
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$485,292
@ $284.30 · 2024-11-22
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $284.49 · 2024-11-12
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $283.30 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$673,568
@ $285.41 · 2024-11-11
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$250,140
@ $284.25 · 2024-11-11
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$567,783
@ $278.73 · 2024-11-08
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$280,719
@ $280.72 · 2024-11-08
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$253,256
@ $276.48 · 2024-11-07
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$828,390
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$962,865
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$137,245
@ $274.49 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $114.57M
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$20.76M
@ $498.27 · 2026-09-14
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$43.39M
@ $501.46 · 2026-09-01
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$4.88M
@ $487.89 · 2026-08-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.39M
@ $496.52 · 2026-08-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MAR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MAR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View MAR Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MAR vs MSFT

Is Marriott International, Inc. or Microsoft Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MSFT trades at a 34.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $752 vs. price $490), compared to MAR's -58.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $212 vs. $335).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Marriott International, Inc. or Microsoft Corporation?

MAR scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while MSFT scores 84/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Marriott International, Inc. or Microsoft Corporation?

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) generates a 2.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Microsoft Corporation's 1.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Marriott International, Inc. or Microsoft Corporation?

MAR earns 21.4% ROIC versus MSFT's 20.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Marriott International, Inc.'s or Microsoft Corporation's?

MSFT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MAR's 94/100 (Very Safe). MSFT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.