Compare Stocks › MA vs UHS

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, MA is overvalued at $638, with a DCF intrinsic value of $563 and a margin of safety of -13%. UHS is undervalued at $176, with an intrinsic value of $300 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, UHS has the wider margin of safety.

MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$638.01
VS
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$176.05

Rewards

MA
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
UHS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MA
  • ⚠FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.00x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $24.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UHS
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MA
UHS
Valuation
$16.63B
Free Cash Flow
$745.07M
2.99%
FCF Yield
7.18%
33.39
Trailing P/E
7.37
27.58
Forward P/E
7.61
Quality & Moat
56.56%
ROIC
10.00%
231.37%
ROE
19.74%
100.00%
Gross Margin
44.51%
1.66
PEG Ratio
1.33
Balance Sheet Safety
2.00
Net Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.59
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.27
0.55%
Dividend Yield
0.45%
MA: 6Ties: 1UHS: 5
MAUHS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UHS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UHS
$1.05
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.36B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MA
13.3% Overvalued
Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $638.01
Fair Value: $562.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UHS
41.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $176.05
Fair Value: $300.03
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $638?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +15.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

UHS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $176?

-0.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%

The market implies -0.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UHS
66/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UHS
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,838
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UHS
Insiders 5.0%Institutions 105.7%
No. of Institutional Holders867
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UHS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MA
9
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.73M
LING HAI
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $620.00 · 2026-10-16
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$435,418
@ $587.61 · 2026-10-12
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UHS
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $980,442
SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
Director
$128,099
@ $190.06 · 2026-03-13
NIMETZ WARREN J.
Director
$852,343
@ $223.30 · 2025-11-11
SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
Director
$217,799
@ $225.70 · 2025-10-29
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$210,053
@ $191.48 · 2025-05-14
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$179,161
@ $179.16 · 2025-03-10
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$308,516
@ $191.15 · 2024-12-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MA
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UHS
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
UHS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View MA Full AnalysisView UHS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MA vs UHS

Is Mastercard Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UHS trades at a 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $300 vs. price $176), compared to MA's -13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $563 vs. $638).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mastercard Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?▼

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while UHS scores 66/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Mastercard Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?▼

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Mastercard Incorporated's 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mastercard Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?▼

MA earns 56.6% ROIC versus UHS's 10.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Mastercard Incorporated's or Universal Health Services, Inc.'s?▼

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to UHS's 88/100 (Very Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MA vs UHS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io