Compare StocksMA vs TRGP

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, MA is fairly valued at $573, with a DCF intrinsic value of $558 and a margin of safety of -3%. TRGP is overvalued at $270, with an intrinsic value of $37 and a margin of safety of -633%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$573.10
VS
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
$270.37

Rewards

MA
  • Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TRGP
  • Targa Resources Corp. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.97 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

MA
  • High leverage (2.33x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $22.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TRGP
  • High leverage (5.82x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $2.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.7% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MA
TRGP
Valuation
$16.96B
Free Cash Flow
$-318.55M
3.38%
FCF Yield
-0.55%
31.54
Trailing P/E
27.62
24.96
Forward P/E
22.60
Quality & Moat
55.99%
ROIC
12.21%
241.20%
ROE
74.10%
100.00%
Gross Margin
41.77%
1.76
PEG Ratio
1.25
Balance Sheet Safety
2.33
Net Debt / Equity
5.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.59
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.65
0.61%
Dividend Yield
1.85%
MA: 7Ties: 1TRGP: 4
MATRGP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TRGP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TRGP
$8.45
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MA
2.7% Overvalued
Price is 2.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $573.10
Fair Value: $557.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TRGP
190.7% Overvalued
Price is 190.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $270.37
Fair Value: $93.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $573?

+15.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +15.1% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +13.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

TRGP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TRGP
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TRGP
-3.07
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.5%Retail & Other 8.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,764
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TRGP
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 1.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,428
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TRGP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MA
5
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.72M
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.36M
@ $500.44 · 2024-11-01
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.30M
@ $491.03 · 2024-09-27
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.29M
@ $489.86 · 2024-09-20
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$550,000
@ $500.00 · 2024-09-17
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.31M
@ $493.10 · 2024-09-13
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$528,000
@ $480.00 · 2024-08-29
MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$42.19M
@ $468.80 · 2024-08-22
MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$42.03M
@ $467.02 · 2024-08-21
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.16M
@ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
LING HAI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$6.11M
@ $455.00 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TRGP
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.68M
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$2.71M
@ $255.96 · 2026-05-12
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$5.93M
@ $241.34 · 2026-03-05
BRANSTETTER BENJAMIN JAMES
Officer
$778,124
@ $238.83 · 2026-03-02
MCDONIE PATRICK J
Officer
$7.55M
@ $239.36 · 2026-03-02
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$100,797
@ $231.72 · 2026-02-26
PRYOR DOUGLAS SCOTT
Officer
$4.01M
@ $228.92 · 2026-02-25
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$311,619
@ $229.30 · 2026-02-24
KNEALE JENNIFER R
President
$6.79M
@ $230.12 · 2026-02-24
SHRADER GERALD R
General Counsel
$498,328
@ $181.21 · 2025-12-05
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$208,042
@ $198.14 · 2025-02-28
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$1.26M
@ $202.91 · 2025-02-28
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$378,167
@ $194.23 · 2025-02-25
KNEALE JENNIFER R
Officer
$5.75M
@ $192.42 · 2025-02-25
MELOY MATTHEW J
Chief Executive Officer
$9.53M
@ $195.08 · 2025-02-25
DAVIS WATERS S IV
Director
$429,802
@ $196.26 · 2025-02-25
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$505,736
@ $202.29 · 2024-12-02
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$1.91M
@ $190.52 · 2024-11-15
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$1.14M
@ $190.68 · 2024-11-08
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$621,809
@ $190.74 · 2024-11-08
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$3.43M
@ $190.03 · 2024-11-08
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$365,504
@ $146.20 · 2024-09-03
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$1.40M
@ $140.04 · 2024-08-14
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$688,134
@ $137.63 · 2024-08-12
SHRADER GERALD R
General Counsel
$408,195
@ $136.06 · 2024-08-09
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$1.87M
@ $134.74 · 2024-08-08
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$160,146
@ $132.02 · 2024-08-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MA
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TRGP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
TRGP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View MA Full AnalysisView TRGP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MA vs TRGP

Is Mastercard Incorporated or Targa Resources Corp. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -2.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $558 vs. price $573), compared to TRGP's -633.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $37 vs. $270).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mastercard Incorporated or Targa Resources Corp.?

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while TRGP scores 54/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Targa Resources Corp. in financial distress?

TRGP's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Mastercard Incorporated or Targa Resources Corp.?

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) generates a 3.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Targa Resources Corp.'s -0.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mastercard Incorporated or Targa Resources Corp.?

MA earns 56.0% ROIC versus TRGP's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Mastercard Incorporated's or Targa Resources Corp.'s?

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to TRGP's 64/100 (Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MA vs TRGP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io