Compare Stocks › MA vs STX

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, MA is overvalued at $638, with a DCF intrinsic value of $563 and a margin of safety of -13%. STX is undervalued at $645, with an intrinsic value of $1047 and a margin of safety of 38%. Of the two, STX has the wider margin of safety.

MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$638.01
VS
STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
$644.58

Rewards

MA
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
STX
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 70.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $12.33 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 33.8x is 27% below the historical average of 46.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

MA
  • ⚠FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.00x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $24.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
STX
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠28 insider sales totaling $326.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MA
STX
Valuation
$16.63B
Free Cash Flow
$3.10B
2.99%
FCF Yield
2.10%
33.39
Trailing P/E
33.80
27.58
Forward P/E
9.82
Quality & Moat
56.56%
ROIC
86.95%
231.37%
ROE
259.35%
100.00%
Gross Margin
50.35%
1.66
PEG Ratio
0.37
Balance Sheet Safety
2.00
Net Debt / Equity
0.41
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.59
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.24
0.55%
Dividend Yield
0.47%
MA: 4Ties: 2STX: 6
MASTX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

STX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STX
$40.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.17B
Δ Market Cap
+$128.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MA
13.3% Overvalued
Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $638.01
Fair Value: $562.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STX
38.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 38.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $644.58
Fair Value: $1047.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $638?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +15.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

STX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $645?

+19.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.7%

The market implies +19.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STX
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STX
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,838
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STX
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 15.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,607
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MA
9
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.73M
LING HAI
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $620.00 · 2026-10-16
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$435,418
@ $587.61 · 2026-10-12
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STX
28
Sells (3M)
70
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $532.11M
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$351,411
@ $642.43 · 2026-10-23
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$8.21M
@ $877.91 · 2026-09-21
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$11.94M
@ $772.18 · 2026-09-15
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$75.58M
@ $772.15 · 2026-09-15
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$38.60M
@ $772.17 · 2026-09-15
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$41.24M
@ $782.08 · 2026-09-15
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$384,952
@ $782.42 · 2026-09-14
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.46M
@ $781.54 · 2026-09-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $841.95 · 2026-09-14
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$770,431
@ $779.00 · 2026-09-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$38.10M
@ $830.01 · 2026-09-11
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$493,355
@ $862.51 · 2026-09-10
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $862.21 · 2026-09-10
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.16M
@ $862.13 · 2026-09-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$570,240
@ $860.09 · 2026-09-10
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$611,332
@ $815.11 · 2026-09-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.49M
@ $816.28 · 2026-09-01
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$7.16M
@ $794.84 · 2026-08-24
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$3.42M
@ $847.67 · 2026-08-21
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$15.41M
@ $849.38 · 2026-08-21
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$7.71M
@ $849.38 · 2026-08-21
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$3.35M
@ $849.52 · 2026-08-21
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$8.41M
@ $852.97 · 2026-08-21
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$5.10M
@ $842.97 · 2026-08-20
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$6.78M
@ $920.80 · 2026-08-13
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$743,706
@ $845.12 · 2026-08-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$5.66M
@ $781.64 · 2026-08-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$11.43M
@ $811.25 · 2026-08-07
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$137,384
@ $817.76 · 2026-08-03
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$10.38M
@ $803.47 · 2026-08-03
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$14.13M
@ $827.30 · 2026-08-03
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$608,950
@ $877.45 · 2026-07-30
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$490,741
@ $905.43 · 2026-07-23
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$18.81M
@ $910.48 · 2026-07-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.64M
@ $924.42 · 2026-07-01
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.20M
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.56M
@ $880.31 · 2026-06-12
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$795,029
@ $880.43 · 2026-06-12
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$870,508
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$471,426
@ $822.73 · 2026-06-10
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $821.96 · 2026-06-10
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.11M
@ $822.06 · 2026-06-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$544,893
@ $821.86 · 2026-06-10
ARUMUGAVELU SHANKAR
Director
$927,680
@ $927.68 · 2026-06-04
BHATT PRATIK
Director
$929,880
@ $929.88 · 2026-06-02
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$663,998
@ $885.33 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$14.60M
@ $900.21 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$12.75M
@ $924.99 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$22.54M
@ $751.29 · 2026-05-20
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$12.69M
@ $815.42 · 2026-05-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.46M
@ $770.00 · 2026-05-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$17.41M
@ $774.22 · 2026-05-06
TILENIUS STEPHANIE SCHEAR
Director
$1.21M
@ $766.61 · 2026-05-05
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$4.15M
@ $738.37 · 2026-05-04
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$516,595
@ $741.17 · 2026-05-04
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.41M
@ $420.73 · 2026-04-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $406.77 · 2026-03-19
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$42,273
@ $377.44 · 2026-03-13
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$295,192
@ $393.59 · 2026-03-02
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$7.70M
@ $384.76 · 2026-03-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$98,400
@ $410.00 · 2026-02-24
CHONG KIAN FATT
Officer
$2.43M
@ $416.48 · 2026-02-23
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.59M
@ $429.27 · 2026-02-02
GELDMACHER JAY L
Director
$414,423
@ $448.02 · 2026-01-30
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$8.93M
@ $442.29 · 2026-01-29
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$234,776
@ $348.85 · 2026-01-26
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$422,626
@ $299.31 · 2026-01-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.71M
@ $285.56 · 2026-01-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$32,984
@ $291.89 · 2025-12-15
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$594,759
@ $295.90 · 2025-12-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MA
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STX
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
STX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View MA Full AnalysisView STX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MA vs STX

Is Mastercard Incorporated or Seagate Technology Holdings plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, STX trades at a 38.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1047 vs. price $645), compared to MA's -13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $563 vs. $638).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mastercard Incorporated or Seagate Technology Holdings plc?▼

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while STX scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Mastercard Incorporated or Seagate Technology Holdings plc?▼

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) generates a 3.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 2.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mastercard Incorporated or Seagate Technology Holdings plc?▼

STX earns 86.9% ROIC versus MA's 56.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Mastercard Incorporated's or Seagate Technology Holdings plc's?▼

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to STX's 85/100 (Very Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MA vs STX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io