Compare StocksMA vs PH

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, MA is fairly valued at $568, with a DCF intrinsic value of $562 and a margin of safety of -1%. PH is overvalued at $919, with an intrinsic value of $779 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$567.75
VS
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$918.75

Rewards

MA
  • Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PH
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

MA
  • High leverage (2.33x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 13 insider sales totaling $62.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PH
  • PEG ratio of 3.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $18.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
MA
PH
Valuation
$16.96B
Free Cash Flow
$3.90B
3.41%
FCF Yield
3.37%
31.54
Trailing P/E
32.26
24.66
Forward P/E
23.46
Quality & Moat
55.99%
ROIC
16.50%
241.20%
ROE
25.08%
100.00%
Gross Margin
37.55%
1.50
PEG Ratio
3.11
Balance Sheet Safety
2.33
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.59
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
0.61%
Dividend Yield
0.87%
MA: 6Ties: 4PH: 2
MAPH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PH
$7.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
MA
1.0% Overvalued
Price is 1.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $567.75
Fair Value: $562.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PH
17.9% Overvalued
Price is 17.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $918.75
Fair Value: $779.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $568?

+15.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.3%

The market implies +15.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +13.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

PH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $919?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PH
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PH
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.2%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,560
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
MA
13
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $66.62M
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.36M
@ $500.44 · 2024-11-01
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.30M
@ $491.03 · 2024-09-27
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.29M
@ $489.86 · 2024-09-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PH
10
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.75M
THOMPSON LAURA K
Director
$153,432
@ $958.95 · 2026-09-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$626,363
@ $1040.47 · 2026-08-26
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-17
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$4.73M
@ $1057.42 · 2026-08-14
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.64M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$738,521
@ $1055.03 · 2026-08-14
REIDY JAY
Officer
$316,731
@ $1055.77 · 2026-08-14
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$664,569
@ $1053.20 · 2026-08-14
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$5.81M
@ $1057.57 · 2026-08-14
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.59M
@ $1058.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.13M
@ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$414,777
@ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.33M
@ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.83M
@ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$818,889
@ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.07M
@ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$4.66M
@ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.25M
@ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$535,766
@ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.38M
@ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$2.24M
@ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$1.02M
@ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$3.03M
@ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.23M
@ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
REIDY JAY
Officer
$337,675
@ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.13M
@ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.47M
@ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$817,477
@ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$589,162
@ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$826,524
@ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$421,510
@ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$202,506
@ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$3.20M
@ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
REIDY JAY
Officer
$335,783
@ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
REIDY JAY
Officer
$93,056
@ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
CZAJA MARK T.
Chief Technology Officer
$266,948
@ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
PAREL DINU JOHN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$2.76M
@ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.46M
@ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.79M
@ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.08M
@ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$3.43M
@ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$825,981
@ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$118,773
@ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.71M
@ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
MA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
MA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
PH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View MA Full AnalysisView PH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: MA vs PH

Is Mastercard Incorporated or Parker-Hannifin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -1.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $562 vs. price $568), compared to PH's -17.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $779 vs. $919).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Mastercard Incorporated or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while PH scores 88/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Mastercard Incorporated or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) generates a 3.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Mastercard Incorporated or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

MA earns 56.0% ROIC versus PH's 16.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Mastercard Incorporated's or Parker-Hannifin Corporation's?

PH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MA's 94/100 (Very Safe). PH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

MA vs PH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io