Compare StocksLYV vs QCOM

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
$158.25
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$177.03

Rewards

LYV
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.31 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

LYV
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 6.13 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (5.72x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LYV
QCOM
Valuation
$1.11B
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
2.98%
FCF Yield
6.87%
N/A
Trailing P/E
19.06
74.23
Forward P/E
16.65
Quality & Moat
-1.34%
ROIC
18.22%
-3.01%
ROE
20.31%
25.55%
Gross Margin
54.80%
6.13
PEG Ratio
0.11
Balance Sheet Safety
5.72
Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.69
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.08%
LYV: 0Ties: 1QCOM: 9
LYVQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LYV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LYV
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.95B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LYV
13.6% Overvalued
Price is 13.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $158.25
Fair Value: $139.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
135.1% Overvalued
Price is 135.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $177.03
Fair Value: $75.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LYV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $158?

+27.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.9%

The market implies +27.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $177?

+15.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.8%

The market implies +15.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LYV
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LYV
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LYV
Insiders 32.2%Institutions 82.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,087
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,708
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LYV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LYV
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.83M
HINSON JEFFREY T
Director
$156,581
@ $165.87 · 2026-03-10
HOPMANS JOHN
Officer
$5.13M
@ $147.38 · 2025-05-16
HINSON JEFFREY T
Director
$539,520
@ $135.66 · 2025-05-09
HINSON JEFFREY T
Director
$61,475
@ $122.95 · 2025-03-12
CAPO BRIAN
Officer
$624,334
@ $123.24 · 2025-03-11
ROWLES MICHAEL G
General Counsel
$14.06M
@ $152.83 · 2025-02-25
BERCHTOLD JOSEPH
President
$2.86M
@ $97.50 · 2024-09-12
RAPINO MICHAEL JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$9.64M
@ $97.50 · 2024-09-12
ROWLES MICHAEL G
General Counsel
$3.42M
@ $97.64 · 2024-09-11
HINSON JEFFREY T
Director
$536,815
@ $95.18 · 2024-09-09
CAPO BRIAN
Officer
$483,050
@ $96.61 · 2024-08-19
HINSON JEFFREY T
Director
$141,165
@ $94.11 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LYV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LYV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View LYV Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis
LYV vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io