Compare StocksLVS vs PFE

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, LVS is undervalued at $41, with a DCF intrinsic value of $71 and a margin of safety of 42%. PFE is overvalued at $27, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -22%. Of the two, LVS has the wider margin of safety.

LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$41.06
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.46

Rewards

LVS
  • Gross margin of 79.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

LVS
  • High leverage (13.28x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 8.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LVS
PFE
Valuation
$2.21B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
8.32%
FCF Yield
7.98%
15.91
Trailing P/E
36.13
11.70
Forward P/E
9.48
Quality & Moat
13.17%
ROIC
9.42%
122.87%
ROE
5.01%
79.33%
Gross Margin
74.72%
0.90
PEG Ratio
12.68
Balance Sheet Safety
13.28
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.57
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
2.92%
Dividend Yield
6.26%
LVS: 5Ties: 2PFE: 5
LVSPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LVS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LVS
$2.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LVS
42.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 42.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $41.06
Fair Value: $71.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
22.4% Overvalued
Price is 22.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.46
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LVS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $41?

+7.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.8%

The market implies +7.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+6.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.2%

The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LVS
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LVS
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LVS
Insiders 61.7%Institutions 42.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,040
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LVS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PANT MUKTESH
Director
$1.00M
@ $43.51 · 2025-03-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LVS
0
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $331.99M
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$616,626
@ $54.09 · 2026-04-27
DUMONT PATRICK
Chief Executive Officer
$3.29M
@ $54.75 · 2026-03-17
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$83.39M
@ $66.71 · 2025-12-17
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$50.09M
@ $66.79 · 2025-12-15
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$26.57M
@ $66.42 · 2025-12-11
DUMONT PATRICK
President
$9.22M
@ $67.96 · 2025-12-03
DUMONT PATRICK
President
$15.91M
@ $69.88 · 2025-12-02
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$3.75M
@ $70.37 · 2025-12-01
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$7.02M
@ $70.17 · 2025-12-01
CHAFETZ IRWIN
Director
$2.09M
@ $69.76 · 2025-12-01
HYZAK RANDY A.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.82M
@ $66.45 · 2025-11-25
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$6.50M
@ $64.99 · 2025-11-07
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$25.22M
@ $63.04 · 2025-11-06
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$23.68M
@ $59.20 · 2025-10-31
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$53.02M
@ $58.92 · 2025-10-30
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.80M
@ $59.32 · 2025-10-27
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$1.08M
@ $54.13 · 2025-09-10
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$526,300
@ $52.63 · 2025-08-06
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$1.33M
@ $51.40 · 2024-11-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LVS
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(20/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LVS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (20)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View LVS Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LVS vs PFE

Is Las Vegas Sands Corp. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, LVS trades at a 42.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $71 vs. price $41), compared to PFE's -22.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $27).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Las Vegas Sands Corp. or Pfizer Inc.?

LVS scores 38/100 (None moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LVS scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Las Vegas Sands Corp. or Pfizer Inc.?

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) generates a 8.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 8.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Las Vegas Sands Corp. or Pfizer Inc.?

LVS earns 13.2% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s or Pfizer Inc.'s?

LVS's dividend earns a safety score of 81/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). LVS has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.