Compare StocksLUV vs MSFT

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, LUV is undervalued at $45, with a DCF intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of 32%. MSFT is undervalued at $465, with an intrinsic value of $724 and a margin of safety of 36%. Of the two, MSFT has the wider margin of safety.

LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
$44.97
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$464.72

Rewards

LUV
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.1x is 32% below the historical average of 41.2x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.36 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 67.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

LUV
  • Gross margin of 22.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.64 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
MSFT
  • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $10.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LUV
MSFT
Valuation
$-834.75M
Free Cash Flow
$66.99B
-3.79%
FCF Yield
1.94%
28.11
Trailing P/E
25.90
9.11
Forward P/E
19.96
Quality & Moat
5.75%
ROIC
20.70%
11.10%
ROE
34.04%
22.40%
Gross Margin
67.94%
0.36
PEG Ratio
1.52
Balance Sheet Safety
0.44
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.33
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.27
1.60%
Dividend Yield
0.78%
LUV: 3Ties: 1MSFT: 8
LUVMSFT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LUV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LUV
$11.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$114.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$1.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$2.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$251.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$657.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LUV
27.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 27.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $44.97
Fair Value: $62.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
35.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $464.72
Fair Value: $724.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LUV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $465?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LUV
37/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LUV
-1.64
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LUV
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 89.8%Retail & Other 9.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,162
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.2%
No. of Institutional Holders8,079
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LUV
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $145,455
SARETSKY GREGG A
Director
$100,447
@ $30.03 · 2025-08-06
FEINBERG SARAH
Director
$45,008
@ $30.01 · 2025-08-05
SARETSKY GREGG A
Director
$100,169
@ $27.29 · 2025-04-30
BREBER PIERRE R.
Director
$268,877
@ $26.89 · 2025-04-29
HESS DAVID P
Director
$198,900
@ $26.52 · 2025-04-28
FEINBERG SARAH
Director
$15,740
@ $31.48 · 2025-03-14
WATSON PATRICIA A
Director
$99,935
@ $30.58 · 2025-03-13
REYNOLDS CHRISTOPHER P.
Director
$99,955
@ $30.68 · 2025-03-13
CUSH C. DAVID
Director
$150,150
@ $30.03 · 2025-03-12
ATHERTON LISA M
Director
$3,691
@ $31.28 · 2025-01-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$7.11M
@ $29.39 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$4.83M
@ $29.15 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$3.75M
@ $29.49 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$15.87M
@ $29.89 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$19.30M
@ $29.98 · 2024-10-01
KELLY GARY C
Officer and Director
$1.00M
@ $29.52 · 2024-09-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$34.92M
@ $29.47 · 2024-09-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$20.93M
@ $29.65 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LUV
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $302,056
JONES JUSTIN
Officer
$302,056
@ $37.36 · 2025-12-05
RUTHERFORD LINDA B
Officer
$132,386
@ $34.39 · 2024-12-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $121.03M
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LUV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LUV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View LUV Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LUV vs MSFT

Is Southwest Airlines Co. or Microsoft Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MSFT trades at a 35.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $724 vs. price $465), compared to LUV's 31.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $66 vs. $45).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Southwest Airlines Co. or Microsoft Corporation?

MSFT scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while LUV scores 37/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Southwest Airlines Co. in financial distress?

LUV's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MSFT scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Southwest Airlines Co. or Microsoft Corporation?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) generates a 1.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Southwest Airlines Co.'s -3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Southwest Airlines Co. or Microsoft Corporation?

MSFT earns 20.7% ROIC versus LUV's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Southwest Airlines Co.'s or Microsoft Corporation's?

MSFT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to LUV's 46/100 (Borderline). MSFT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Southwest Airlines Co. have accounting red flags?

LUV's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, MSFT scores -2.6, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.