SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › LULU vs PFE

lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$128.98
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$26.30

Rewards

LULU
  • ★lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★lululemon athletica inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 41.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Dividend yield of 6.53% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • ★FCF yield of 9.0% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

LULU
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LULU
PFE
Valuation
$824.08M
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
5.45%
FCF Yield
8.98%
9.73
Trailing P/E
19.34
9.74
Forward P/E
9.34
Quality & Moat
28.95%
ROIC
7.67%
31.83%
ROE
8.96%
56.60%
Gross Margin
75.81%
0.64
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
0.36
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.00
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
N/A
Dividend Yield
6.53%
LULU: 6Ties: 2PFE: 3
LULUPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LULU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LULU
$-10.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.94B
Δ Market Cap
$-50.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LULU
55.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 55.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $128.98
Fair Value: $287.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
130.5% Overvalued
Price is 130.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $26.30
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LULU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $129?

-2.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.5%

The market implies -2.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $26?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.9%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LULU
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LULU
-1.92
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LULU
Insiders 4.7%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 16.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,417
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.9%Retail & Other 32.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,687
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LULU
2
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.49M
MAESTRINI ANDRE
Chief Executive Officer
$494,590
@ $151.02 · 2026-04-01
BERGH CHARLES V
Director
$999,978
@ $164.20 · 2026-03-20
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LULU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.90M
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$100,142
@ $161.00 · 2026-04-08
FRANK MEGHAN
Chief Financial Officer
$561,821
@ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$2.76M
@ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$109,470
@ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$6.38M
@ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$782,735
@ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$10.09M
@ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$131,021
@ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LULU
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LULU
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View LULU Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis
LULU vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io